Skip Navigation



American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access published online on April 29, 2008

American Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/aje/kwn089
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
167/12/1416    most recent
kwn089v2
kwn089v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Linet, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Linet, M. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology © The Author 2008. Published by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Invited Commentary: Postmenopausal Unopposed Estrogen and Breast Cancer Risk in the Women's Health Initiative—Before and Beyond

Martha S. Linet

From the Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD

Correspondence to Dr. Martha S. Linet, Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 6120 Executive Boulevard, EPS Room 7048, Bethesda, MD 20892-7238 (e-mail: linetm{at}mail.nih.gov).

Received for publication January 8, 2008. Accepted for publication March 11, 2008.

Three large clinical trials provoked major debate when hormone replacement therapy (HRT) did not reduce coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women as expected from observational epidemiologic studies. Less discussion has ensued about breast cancer or other adverse events. In this issue of the Journal, investigators from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) compare breast cancer findings from the randomized trial of unopposed estrogen with those from the large WHI observational study. This commentary briefly summarizes historical highlights of menopausal hormone use; risk-versus-benefit evaluations; scientific, clinical, and policy influences immediately before and during the WHI trial; breast cancer incidence trends; and the posttrial response in US clinical practice. Factors complicating interpretation of the results include differences in breast cancer risk profiles between women in the trial and those in the observational study cohort as well as heterogeneity in the definitions of menopause and prior use of HRT as applied by the WHI investigators to the two populations. Because millions of women use HRT, it is important to consider how the WHI and other research investigations might contribute to reducing gaps in understanding the relation between HRT and breast cancer risk.

breast neoplasms; clinical trial; epidemiologic studies; estrogens; hormone replacement therapy; menopause; risk-benefit assessment

Abbreviations: HRT, hormone replacement therapy; WHI, Women's Health Initiative


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.