Skip Navigation



American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access published online on February 25, 2008

American Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/aje/kwn003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
167/9/1130    most recent
kwn003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bellera, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Albertsen, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bellera, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Albertsen, P. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology © The Author 2008. Published by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Practice of Epidemiology

Detecting Trends in Noisy Data Series: Application to Biomarker Series

Carine A. Bellera1,2, James A. Hanley2, Lawrence Joseph2 and Peter C. Albertsen3

1 Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Institut Bergonié, Regional Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France
2 Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
3 Division of Urology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT

Correspondence to Carine A. Bellera, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Institut Bergonié, Regional Comprehensive Cancer Center, 229 Cours de l'Argonne, 33076 Bordeaux, France (e-mail: bellera{at}bergonie.org).

Received for publication June 30, 2007. Accepted for publication January 2, 2008.

It is common to define a change in health status or in a disease state on the basis of a sustained rise (or decline) in a biomarker over time. However, such observations are often subject to important variability unrelated to the underlying biologic process. The authors propose a method to evaluate rules that define an event on the basis of consecutive increases (or decreases) in the observations, given the presence of random variation. They examine how well these rules correctly identify a truly rising biomarker trajectory and, conversely, how often they can recognize a truly stable series or a slowly rising series. The method relies on simulation of realistic, sophisticated data sets that accurately reflect the systematic and random variations observed in marker series. These flexible, empirically based simulations enable estimation of the sensitivity and specificity of rules of consecutive rises as a function of the underlying trend, amount of random variation, and schedule of measurements (frequency and duration of follow-up). The authors illustrate the approach with postradiotherapy series of prostate-specific antigen, where three consecutive rises in prostate-specific antigen indicate treatment failure; the data are described by using a Bayesian hierarchical changepoint model. The method is particularly flexible and could be applied to evaluate other rules that purport to accurately detect upturns (downturns) in other noisy data series, including other medical data or other application areas.

Bayesian hierarchical model; changepoint; Markov chain Monte Carlo; noise; prostate-specific antigen; sensitivity and specificity; simulation; trend analysis

Abbreviations: ASTRO, American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology; MCMC, Markov chain Monte Carlo; PSA, prostate-specific antigen


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.