Skip Navigation



American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access published online on August 16, 2007

American Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/aje/kwm188
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
166/10/1220    most recent
kwm188v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lessler, J.
Right arrow Articles by Perl, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lessler, J.
Right arrow Articles by Perl, T. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology © The Author 2007. Published by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

An Evaluation of Classification Rules Based on Date of Symptom Onset to Identify Health-Care–associated Infections

Justin Lessler1, Ron Brookmeyer2 and Trish M. Perl1,3

1 Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
2 Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
3 Department of Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control and Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD

Correspondence to Justin Lessler, 615 North Wolfe Street, Box 352, Baltimore, MD 21224 (e-mail: jlessler{at}jhsph.edu).

Received for publication December 4, 2006. Accepted for publication May 25, 2007.

The date of symptom onset is often used to distinguish health-care–associated from community-acquired infections. Those patients developing symptoms early in an inpatient stay are considered to have community-acquired infection, while those developing symptoms later are considered nosocomially infected. The authors evaluate the performance of this approach, showing how misclassification rates depend on the disease incubation period and the incidence rate ratio of infection among inpatients versus community members. The authors provide quantitative results for selecting classification rules that designate infections as health care associated or community acquired. These techniques allow the selection of disease-specific cutoffs to distinguish community- from nosocomially acquired infections that perform well for important illnesses. For example, a rule classifying those who develop flu symptoms in the first 1.5 days of their hospital stay as having community-acquired influenza and those developing symptoms later as having nosocomial infection has a positive predictive value and a negative predictive value of at least 87%. A cutoff of 6 days will identify community-acquired Legionnaires' disease with a positive predictive value and a negative predictive value of at least 77%. These results increase the utility of classifying infections by use of the date of onset by providing theoretically sound measures of performance, and they are applicable beyond the hospital setting.

communicable diseases; community-acquired infections; cross infection; infection control

Abbreviations: MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.