Skip Navigation



American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access published online on August 9, 2007

American Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/aje/kwm183
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
166/9/1005    most recent
kwm183v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rousseau, M.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Siemiatycki, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rousseau, M.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Siemiatycki, J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology © The Author 2007. Published by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION

Occupational Exposure to Lead Compounds and Risk of Cancer among Men: A Population-based Case-Control Study

M.-C. Rousseau1, M.-E. Parent1, L Nadon1, B Latreille1 and J Siemiatycki2

1 INRS–Institut Armand-Frappier, University of Quebec, Laval, Quebec, Canada
2 Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Correspondence to Dr. Marie-Claude Rousseau, INRS–Institut Armand-Frappier, 531 Boulevard des Prairies, Laval, Quebec, Canada H7V 1B7 (e-mail: marie-claude.rousseau{at}iaf.inrs.ca).

Received for publication November 8, 2006. Accepted for publication May 17, 2007.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer recently classified inorganic lead as a probable carcinogen, while organic lead remained unclassifiable. Uncertainty persists because of limited epidemiologic evidence. The authors addressed the relation between occupational exposure to lead and the risk of 11 types of cancer among men in a case-control study conducted in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, in the 1980s. Incident cases (n = 3,730) and general population controls (n = 533) were interviewed to elicit information on job history and potential confounders. Expert chemists translated each job into a list of substances to which the subject had potentially been exposed. Exposure to lead was classified into three categories: organic lead (3% of subjects ever exposed), inorganic lead (17%), and lead in gasoline emissions (39%). Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by logistic regression using two control groups: general population controls and cancer controls. Stomach cancer was associated with organic lead when the authors used population controls (odds ratio (OR) = 3.0, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2, 7.3) and cancer controls (OR = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.1, 3.8) and with substantial exposure to lead in gasoline emissions when they used cancer controls (OR = 2.9, 95% CI: 1.4, 5.9). There was no association with inorganic lead and little evidence for associations with other cancer types.

case-control studies; inorganic chemicals; lead; male; neoplasms; occupational exposure; organic chemicals

Abbreviations: IARC, International Agency for Research on Cancer


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M.-C. Rousseau, M.-E. Parent, L. Nadon, B. Latreille, and J. Siemiatycki
THE AUTHORS REPLY
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 15, 2008; 168(10): 1217 - 1218.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
E. Delzell
RE: "OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO LEAD COMPOUNDS AND RISK OF CANCER AMONG MEN: A POPULATION-BASED CASE-CONTROL STUDY" 1681012181218
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 15, 2008; 168(10): 1216 - 1217.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.