Skip Navigation



American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access published online on March 14, 2007

American Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/aje/kwm001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
165/11/1296    most recent
kwm001v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Folsom, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Folsom, A. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Copyright © 2007 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health All rights reserved; printed in U.S.A.

Original Contribution

Race-Gender Differences in the Association of Trait Anger with Subclinical Carotid Artery Atherosclerosis

The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study

Janice E. Williams1, David J. Couper1, Rebecca Din-Dzietham2, F. Javier Nieto3 and Aaron R. Folsom4

1 LaGrange, GA
2 Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
3 University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
4 University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN

Correspondence to Dr. Janice E. Williams, P.O. Box 3168, LaGrange, GA 30241-3533 (e-mail: jwill22{at}bellsouth.net).

Received for publication February 17, 2006. Accepted for publication November 20, 2006.

This paper examines the association between trait anger and subclinical carotid artery atherosclerosis among 14,098 Black or White men and women, aged 48–67 years, in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study cohort, 1990–1992. Trait anger was assessed using the 10-item Spielberger Trait Anger Scale. Carotid atherosclerosis was determined by an averaged measure of the wall intimal-medial thickness (IMT) of the carotid bifurcation and of the internal and common carotids, measured by high-resolution B-mode ultrasound. In the full study cohort, trait anger and carotid IMT were significantly and positively associated (p = 0.04). In race-gender stratified analysis, the association was strongest and independent only in Black men, among whom a significant trait anger-carotid IMT relation was observed for both the overall trait anger measure (p = 0.004) and the anger reaction dimension (p = 0.001). In Black men, carotid IMT levels increased across categories of overall trait anger and anger reaction, resulting in clinically significant differences (67 µm (95% confidence interval: 23, 110) and 82 µm (95% confidence interval: 40, 125), respectively) from low to high anger. Sociodemographic, lifestyle, anthropometric, and biologic cardiovascular disease risk factors appear to mediate the relation in Black women, White men, and White women. In conclusion, these findings document disparate race-gender patterns in the association of trait anger with subclinical carotid artery atherosclerosis.

atherosclerosis; carotid arteries; continental population groups; sex; stress, psychological

Abbreviations: ARIC, Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities; CI, confidence interval; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; IMT, intimal-medial thickness; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; SD, standard deviation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.