Skip Navigation



American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access published online on November 7, 2006

American Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/aje/kwj363
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplemental Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
165/2/157    most recent
kwj363v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baird, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Schectman, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baird, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Schectman, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Copyright © 2006 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health All rights reserved; printed in U.S.A.
Received January 4, 2006
Accepted June 5, 2006

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Association of Physical Activity with Development of Uterine Leiomyoma

Donna Day Baird 1 *, David B. Dunson 2, Michael C. Hill 3, Deborah Cousins 4, and Joel M. Schectman 5

1 Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, NC
2 Biostatistics Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, NC
3 Department of Radiology, George Washington University Medical Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC
4 Coda Research, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC
5 Department of Health Care Sciences, George Washington University Medical Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Donna Day Baird, E-mail: baird{at}niehs.nih.gov


   Abstract

The relation between physical activity and uterine leiomyomata (fibroids) has received little study, but exercise is protective for breast cancer, another hormonally mediated tumor. Participants in this study were randomly selected members of a health plan based in Washington, DC, aged 35-49 years (734 African Americans, 455 Whites) enrolled between 1996 and 1999. Fibroid status was based on ultrasound screening. Physical activity was based on detailed interview questions. Logistic regression with adjustment for body mass index and other risk factors showed that women in the highest category of physical activity were significantly less likely to have fibroids (odds ratio = 0.6, 95% confidence interval = 0.4, 0.9 for the highest vs. the lowest category (equivalent to approximately ≥7 hours/week vs. <2 hours/week)). There was a dose-response pattern; a significant trend was seen for both African-American and White women. A multistate Bayesian analysis indicated that exercise was associated with tumor onset more strongly than with tumor growth. When data for women who reported major fibroid-related symptoms were excluded, results remained essentially unchanged, suggesting that the observed association could not be attributed to reverse causation (fibroids preventing exercise). The authors concluded that regular exercise might help women prevent fibroids.

Keywords: body mass index; causality; exercise; leiomyoma; ultrasonics.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. A. D'Aloisio, J. C. Schroeder, K. E. North, C. Poole, S. L. West, G. S. Travlos, and D. D. Baird
IGF-I and IGFBP-3 Polymorphisms in Relation to Circulating Levels among African American and Caucasian Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2009; 18(3): 954 - 966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.