Skip Navigation



American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access published online on March 22, 2006

American Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/aje/kwj128
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
163/12/1101    most recent
kwj128v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tworoger, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hankinson, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tworoger, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hankinson, S. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Copyright © 2006 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health All rights reserved; printed in U.S.A.
Received July 15, 2005
Accepted December 28, 2005

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Intake of Folate and Related Nutrients in Relation to Risk of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Shelley S. Tworoger 1 *, Jonathan L. Hecht 2, Edward Giovannucci 3, and Susan E. Hankinson 1

1 Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
2 Department of Pathology, Beth-Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
3 Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Shelley S. Tworoger, E-mail: nhsst{at}channing.harvard.edu


   Abstract

Assessments of the relation between folate intake and ovarian cancer risk have been limited and inconsistent. Therefore, the authors prospectively examined the association of dietary and supplemental intakes of folate, methionine, and vitamin B6 with ovarian cancer risk among 80,254 Nurses' Health Study participants. Beginning in 1976, women completed biennial questionnaires assessing ovarian cancer risk factors; starting in 1980, food frequency questionnaires were administered every 2-4 years. During 22 years of follow-up (1980-2002), the authors confirmed 481 incident epithelial ovarian cancers. There were no associations between total folate (top quintile vs. bottom: relative risk (RR) = 1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.92, 1.60), methionine (RR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.76, 1.33), dietary vitamin B6 (RR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.81, 1.47), or total vitamin B6 (RR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.85, 1.51) intake and ovarian cancer risk. Higher dietary folate was associated with a modestly decreased risk after exclusion of cases diagnosed during the 4 follow-up years after dietary assessment (RR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.43, 1.03) and for the serous subtype (RR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.31, 0.84). Results did not vary by alcohol intake, multivitamin use, menopausal status, or oral contraceptive use. There was little evidence that folate, methionine, and vitamin B6 are important in ovarian cancer risk, although dietary folate was inversely associated with risk in some analyses.

Keywords: diet; folic acid; methionine; ovarian neoplasms; vitamin B 6.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
Q. Yang, R. M. Bostick, J.M. Friedman, and W. D. Flanders
Serum Folate and Cancer Mortality Among U.S. Adults: Findings from the Third National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey Linked Mortality File
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2009; 18(5): 1439 - 1447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A D. Smith, Y.-I. Kim, and H. Refsum
Is folic acid good for everyone?
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2008; 87(3): 517 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.