American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on November 19, 2008
American Journal of Epidemiology 2009 169(2):236-248; doi:10.1093/aje/kwn301
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY |
Optimal Serum Cotinine Levels for Distinguishing Cigarette Smokers and Nonsmokers Within Different Racial/Ethnic Groups in the United States Between 1999 and 2004
Correspondence to Dr. Neal L. Benowitz, Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Box 1220, San Francisco, CA 94143-1220 (e-mail: nbenowitz{at}medsfgh.ucsf.edu).
Received for publication April 17, 2008. Accepted for publication September 3, 2008.
Cotinine, a metabolite of nicotine, is widely used to distinguish smokers from nonsmokers in epidemiologic studies and smoking-cessation clinical trials. As the magnitude of secondhand smoke exposure declines because of proportionally fewer smokers and more clean-indoor-air regulations, the optimal cotinine cutpoint with which to distinguish smokers from nonsmokers is expected to change. The authors analyzed data on 3,078 smokers and 13,078 nonsmokers from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for 1999–2004. Optimal serum cotinine concentrations for discriminating smokers from nonsmokers were determined using receiver operator characteristic curve analysis. Optimal cotinine cutpoints were 3.08 ng/mL (sensitivity = 96.3%, specificity = 97.4%) and 2.99 ng/mL (sensitivity = 86.5%, specificity = 93.1%) for adults and adolescents, respectively. Among adults, optimal cutpoints differed by race/ethnicity: They were 5.92 ng/mL, 4.85 ng/mL, and 0.84 ng/mL for non-Hispanic blacks, non-Hispanic whites, and Mexican Americans, respectively. Among adolescents, cutpoints were 2.77 ng/mL, 2.95 ng/mL, and 1.18 ng/mL for non-Hispanic blacks, non-Hispanic whites, and Mexican Americans, respectively. Use of the currently accepted cutpoint of 14 ng/mL overestimates the number of nonsmokers in comparison with the proposed new overall cutpoint of 3 ng/mL or the race/ethnicity-specific cutpoints of 1–6 ng/mL.
African Americans; continental population groups; cotinine; Mexican Americans; smoking; tobacco; tobacco smoke pollution
Abbreviations: MEC, mobile examination center; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; ROC, receiver operating characteristic
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. T. Bernert, P. Jacob III, D. B. Holiday, N. L. Benowitz, C. S. Sosnoff, M. V. Doig, C. Feyerabend, K. M. Aldous, M. Sharifi, M. D. Kellogg, et al. Interlaboratory comparability of serum cotinine measurements at smoker and nonsmoker concentration levels: A round-robin study Nicotine Tob Res, December 1, 2009; 11(12): 1458 - 1466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Khanna, J. Xu, P. A. Uber, A. P. Burke, C. Baquet, and M. R. Mehra Tobacco Smoke Exposure in Either the Donor or Recipient Before Transplantation Accelerates Cardiac Allograft Rejection, Vascular Inflammation, and Graft Loss Circulation, November 3, 2009; 120(18): 1814 - 1821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Keskitalo, U. Broms, M. Heliovaara, S. Ripatti, I. Surakka, M. Perola, J. Pitkaniemi, L. Peltonen, A. Aromaa, and J. Kaprio Association of serum cotinine level with a cluster of three nicotinic acetylcholine receptor genes (CHRNA3/CHRNA5/CHRNB4) on chromosome 15 Hum. Mol. Genet., October 15, 2009; 18(20): 4007 - 4012. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. L. Benowitz, K. E. Schultz, C. A. Haller, A. H. B. Wu, K. M. Dains, and P. Jacob III Prevalence of Smoking Assessed Biochemically in an Urban Public Hospital: A Rationale for Routine Cotinine Screening Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2009; 170(7): 885 - 891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Rudin, E. Avila-Tang, C. C. Harris, J. G. Herman, F. R. Hirsch, W. Pao, A. G. Schwartz, K. H. Vahakangas, and J. M. Samet Lung Cancer in Never Smokers: Molecular Profiles and Therapeutic Implications Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2009; 15(18): 5646 - 5661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




