Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on November 12, 2008
American Journal of Epidemiology 2009 169(2):127-131; doi:10.1093/aje/kwn311
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
169/2/127    most recent
kwn311v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armenian, H. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Armenian, H. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology © The Author 2008. Published by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Epidemiology: A Problem-solving Journey

Haroutune K. Armenian

Correspondence to Dr. Haroutune K. Armenian, 6108 Sister Elsie Drive, Tujunga, CA 91042 (e-mail: harmenia{at}jhsph.edu).

Received for publication March 13, 2008. Accepted for publication September 3, 2008.

As a scientific discipline, epidemiology has helped liberate the practice of public health and medicine from dogmatic thinking over the past century. This commentary highlights some integrating principles to explain why epidemiology is a problem-solving discipline. The first of these is that epidemiology is an information science. Epidemiology generates information for decision-making at all levels of the health-care system, including information for both individuals and the general public. Although all scientific disciplines produce data that may be used for decision-making, there is more immediacy for the decisions in epidemiology. The second principle is that epidemiology operates within an environment of complex systems. Etiologic factors operate in complex systems, and the use of a systems analysis approach in investigating health problems must be considered. The third principle is that epidemiology is not just a scientific discipline but a professional practice area as well. Epidemiology has a solid disciplinary scientific base, and its practice requires well-grounded academic preparation. Its objectives are very much within the public–social domain, and a well-defined, outcome-oriented, prevention-based philosophy steers its practice. In a number of universities, epidemiology is taught today as a research discipline rather than as an operational, problem-solving one. In conclusion, this commentary emphasizes the need to accept the fact that epidemiology has as much of a social role as a scientific one. Public health action, problem solving, and a sense of mission are what brings many students to epidemiology. A problem-solving, action-oriented epidemiology is consistent with that sense of mission.

education, professional; epidemiology; information science; problem solving


Abbreviations: DDD, disease, disability, and death


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.