American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on August 27, 2008
American Journal of Epidemiology 2008 168(9):990-992; doi:10.1093/aje/kwn193
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Invited Commentary: Disaggregating Preterm Birth to Determine Etiology
Correspondence to Dr. David A. Savitz, Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1057, New York, NY 10029 (e-mail: david.savitz{at}mssm.edu).
Received for publication April 16, 2008. Accepted for publication April 30, 2008.
Identifying the causes of preterm birth has been problematic, in part because of heterogeneous pathways leading to the same event, early delivery. If a risk factor affects only a subset of cases, then studies that address the aggregate outcome will generate diluted measures of association. McElrath et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168(9):980–989) examined an array of potential influences on very early preterm birth (<28 weeks gestation) and divided cases on the basis of proximal causes. Through factor analysis, they found empirical support for dividing preterm cases into 2 groups: intrauterine inflammation (preterm labor, preterm membrane rupture, placental abruption, and cervical insufficiency) and abnormal placentation (preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction). Replication of this classification in less extreme preterm births is needed, requiring large numbers of preterm births that have been characterized in detail. Nonetheless, this division is worthy of study by using previously collected data to determine whether, in fact, stronger associations are found for these subsets than for preterm birth in the aggregate. Ultimately, the test of the approach is in improving our understanding of etiology, ideally generating stronger, more consistent associations with preterm birth subsets than have been found for preterm birth in the aggregate.
premature birth
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. A. Boyd, G. Poulsen, J. Wohlfahrt, J. C. Murray, B. Feenstra, and M. Melbye Maternal Contributions to Preterm Delivery Am. J. Epidemiol., October 23, 2009; (2009) kwp324v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Weinberg and M. Shi The Genetics of Preterm Birth: Using What We Know to Design Better Association Studies Am. J. Epidemiol., October 23, 2009; (2009) kwp325v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Little Invited Commentary: Maternal Effects in Preterm Birth--Effects of Maternal Genotype, Mitochondrial DNA, Imprinting, or Environment? Am. J. Epidemiol., October 23, 2009; (2009) kwp326v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. F. McElrath and J. L. Hecht Invited Commentary: Intrauterine Epidemiology Am. J. Epidemiol., July 15, 2009; 170(2): 159 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. F. McElrath, J. L. Hecht, O. Dammann, K. Boggess, A. Onderdonk, G. Markenson, M. Harper, E. Delpapa, E. N. Allred, and A. Leviton McElrath et al. Respond to "Disaggregating Preterm Birth" Am. J. Epidemiol., November 1, 2008; 168(9): 993 - 994. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
