Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on May 20, 2008
American Journal of Epidemiology 2008 168(4):422-426; doi:10.1093/aje/kwn115
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
168/4/422    most recent
kwn115v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mikolajczyk, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Grewal, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mikolajczyk, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Grewal, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Published by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health 2008.

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Effects of Interpregnancy Interval on Blood Pressure in Consecutive Pregnancies

Rafael T. Mikolajczyk, Jun Zhang, Jessie Ford and Jagteshwar Grewal

From the Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD

Correspondence to Dr. Jun Zhang, Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Building 6100, Room 7B03, Bethesda, MD 20892 (e-mail: zhangj{at}mail.nih.gov).

Received for publication December 18, 2007. Accepted for publication April 4, 2008.

The lower risk of preeclampsia observed in parous women has prompted a hypothesis that cardiovascular adaptation from a first pregnancy has ongoing benefits which contribute to a reduced risk of preeclampsia in the second pregnancy. However, how the interpregnancy interval affects mean arterial pressure (MAP) as an indicator of cardiovascular adaptation in subsequent pregnancies has not been well studied. The authors examined the effect of interpregnancy interval on MAP in consecutive pregnancies using data from the Collaborative Perinatal Project (1959–1965) and a semiparametric random-effects regression model. Prenatal MAP measurements were available for 533 women with both first and second births. MAP was lower in the second pregnancy (by approximately 2 mmHg) for very short interpregnancy intervals. However, this difference diminished when the interval increased, and it totally disappeared for intervals longer than 2 years. The authors conclude that although MAP is lower in the second pregnancy than in the first pregnancy, the effect persists for only a short time. It is therefore unlikely that mechanisms involving MAP as an indicator of cardiovascular adaptation contribute appreciably to the reduced risk of preeclampsia in subsequent pregnancies. However, it does not rule out the possibility that other mechanisms of cardiovascular adaptation persist longer.

birth intervals; blood pressure; pre-eclampsia; pregnancy


Abbreviations: CPP, Collaborative Perinatal Project; MAP, mean arterial pressure


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.