Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on March 7, 2008
American Journal of Epidemiology 2008 167(10):1260-1267; doi:10.1093/aje/kwn012
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
167/10/1260    most recent
kwn012v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beckett, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ashton, L. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beckett, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ashton, L. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology © The Author 2008. Published by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

Buccal Swabs and Treated Cards: Methodological Considerations for Molecular Epidemiologic Studies Examining Pediatric Populations

Sara M. Beckett1, Stephen J. Laughton2, Luciano Dalla Pozza3, Geoffrey B. McCowage3, Glenn Marshall4, Richard J. Cohn4, Elizabeth Milne5 and Lesley J. Ashton1

1 Children's Cancer Institute Australia for Medical Research, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
2 Department of Hematology and Oncology, Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
3 Department of Oncology, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
4 Center for Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
5 Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Center for Child Health Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Correspondence to Dr. Lesley Ashton, Molecular Epidemiology Group, Children's Cancer Institute Australia for Medical Research, P.O. Box 81, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia (e-mail: lashton{at}ccia.unsw.edu.au).

Received for publication June 26, 2007. Accepted for publication January 14, 2008.

Self-collection of buccal cells provides a noninvasive method for obtaining biologic samples for genetic analyses in pediatric studies. Nevertheless, low yields, microbial contamination, and degradation of buccal samples present challenges for epidemiologic studies incorporating genetic investigations. The aims of this study were to compare the quality and yield of DNA extracted from buccal specimens with BuccalAmp swabs (Epicenter BioTechnologies, Madison, Wisconsin) or FTA cards (Whatman, Inc., Clifton, New Jersey) and to investigate the use of whole-genome amplification (WGA) for increasing DNA yields for single nucleotide polymorphism analyses. Buccal specimens were collected from 55 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and 52 control children without acute lymphoblastic leukemia in New South Wales, Australia, in 2003–2004. Real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to evaluate polymorphisms in the genes encoding the cytochrome p450 enzyme CYP3A4 (CYP3A4 A392G, also known as CYP3A4*1B) and the steroid xenobiotic receptor (SXR C25385T). Results showed that DNA could be isolated from buccal specimens collected by use of both methods and that yields could be substantially improved with WGA without introducing genotyping error. However, DNA quality was poorer in samples collected by BuccalAmp swabs, and the presence of polymerase chain reaction inhibitors in these samples reduced the sensitivity of quantitative real-time PCR analysis. These findings show that different methods for collecting buccal samples impact on the downstream success of genetic investigations and influence DNA quality after WGA.

DNA; epidemiologic methods; epidemiology, molecular; genome; mouth mucosa; pediatrics


Abbreviations: MDA, multiple displacement amplification; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; WGA, whole-genome amplification


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.