Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on October 31, 2007
American Journal of Epidemiology 2008 167(1):20-22; doi:10.1093/aje/kwm310
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
167/1/20    most recent
kwm310v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Am. J. Epidemiol.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunn, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dunn, K. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology © The Author 2007. Published by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Invited Commentary

Invited Commentary: Topical Threats to Epidemiology

Kate M. Dunn

From the Primary Care Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences Research, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, United Kingdom

Correspondence to Dr. Kate M. Dunn, Primary Care Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences Research, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, United Kingdom (e-mail: k.m.dunn{at}cphc.keele.ac.uk).

Received for publication July 19, 2007. Accepted for publication September 21, 2007.

Epidemiologic studies are subject to social and cultural influences, which can influence the way samples are identified or included and information is collected. In this commentary, the author highlights issues related to several factors that may influence current research methods, such as changes in telephone use and new ethical guidelines. Technologic developments that have the potential to provide new opportunities for sample selection and data collection are also outlined. Epidemiologists need to be flexible and responsive to changes that may influence their research methods and should use their training and judgment to assess the likely impact of any potential biases or influences, so that study quality is maintained.

bias (epidemiology); cellular phone; data collection; epidemiologic methods; Internet; research design; sampling studies; technology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Am. J. Epidemiol.:

Declining Estimated Prevalence of Alcohol Drinking and Smoking among Young Adults Nationally: Artifacts of Sample Undercoverage?
Cristine D. Delnevo, Daniel A. Gundersen, and Brett T. Hagman
Am. J. Epidemiol. 2008 167: 15-19. [Abstract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
C. D. Delnevo, D. A. Gundersen, and B. T. Hagman
Delnevo et al. Respond to "Topical Threats to Epidemiology"
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 1, 2008; 167(1): 23 - 24.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.