Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on July 21, 2007
American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 166(7):841-851; doi:10.1093/aje/kwm149
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Video
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
166/7/841    most recent
kwm149v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bootsma, M.
Right arrow Articles by Diekmann, O
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bootsma, M.
Right arrow Articles by Diekmann, O
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology © The Author 2007. Published by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

An Algorithm to Estimate the Importance of Bacterial Acquisition Routes in Hospital Settings

MCJ Bootsma1, MJM Bonten2,3,4, S Nijssen2, AC Fluit3 and O Diekmann1

1 Department of Mathematics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Kingdom of the Netherlands
2 Department of Internal Medicine and Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Kingdom of the Netherlands
3 Eijkman Winkler Institute for Microbiology, Infectious Diseases, and Inflammation, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Kingdom of the Netherlands
4 Julius Center for Health Research and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Kingdom of the Netherlands

Correspondence to Dr. Martin Bootsma, Mathematical Institute, Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 6, 3508 TA Utrecht, Kingdom of the Netherlands (e-mail: bootsma{at}math.uu.nl).

Received for publication December 4, 2006. Accepted for publication April 4, 2007.

An algorithm is presented to calculate likelihoods of acquisition routes using only individual patient data concerning period of stay and microbiologic surveillance (without genotyping). The algorithm also produces estimates for the prevalence and the number of acquisitions by each route. The algorithm is applied to colonization data of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) from September 2001 to May 2002 in two intensive care units (ICUs) (n = 277 and n = 180, respectively) of Utrecht, Kingdom of the Netherlands. Genotyping and epidemiologic linkage are used as the reference standard. Surveillance cultures were obtained on admission and twice weekly thereafter. All CREs were genotyped. According to the reference standard, the daily prevalence of CRE in ICU-1 and ICU-2 was 26.1% (standard deviation: 15.4) and 15.1% (standard deviation: 13.4), respectively, with five of 23 (21.7%) and six of 21 (28.6%) cases of acquired colonization being of exogenous origin, respectively. On the basis of the algorithm, the endogenous route was responsible for more acquisitions than the exogenous route (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001 for ICU-1 and ICU-2, respectively). The estimated number of acquisitions is 30 and 27, and the estimated prevalence is 27.6% and 17.6% for ICU-1 and ICU-2, respectively. By use of longitudinal colonization data only, the algorithm determines the relative importance of acquisition routes taking patient dependency into account.

algorithms; disease transmission; Enterobacteriaceae; maximum likelihood; parameters; small population


Abbreviations: AFLP, amplified fragment-length polymorphism; CRE, cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae; ICU(s), intensive care unit(s); MLE, maximum likelihood estimate; SD, standard deviation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
B. S. Cooper, G. F. Medley, S. J. Bradley, and G. M. Scott
An Augmented Data Method for the Analysis of Nosocomial Infection Data
Am. J. Epidemiol., September 1, 2008; 168(5): 548 - 557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.