Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on May 11, 2007
American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 166(1):1-4; doi:10.1093/aje/kwm160
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
166/1/1    most recent
kwm160v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lilienfeld, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lilienfeld, D. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Copyright © 2007 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health All rights reserved; printed in U.S.A.

The General Epidemiologist: Is There a Place in Today's Epidemiology?

David E. Lilienfeld

399 Port Royal Avenue, Foster City, CA 94404

Correspondence to Dr. David E. Lilienfeld, 399 Port Royal Avenue, Foster City, CA 94404 (e-mail: Lilienfeld{at}comcast.net).

Received for publication August 7, 2006. Accepted for publication April 25, 2007.

Epidemiology has changed remarkably during its growth in the past quarter century. One of those changes has been the ever-increasing specialization among its practitioners. In this commentary, the author explores the degree to which this phenomenon has shaped the field. A partial explanation for this trend is found in the decline in the availability of training funds not focused on specific disease areas. Although it appears likely that epidemiology can continue to flourish without general epidemiologists, the field will lose some of its ability to quickly respond to emerging public health challenges. The author considers steps necessary for the training and inclusion of general epidemiologists.

education; epidemiology; public health research

Abbreviations: CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; NIH, National Institutes of Health


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
J. B Bellido-Blasco
A day in the life of a local epidemiologist (and endemiologist)
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, June 1, 2008; 62(6): 479 - 479.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
C. Wang and W. Winkelstein Jr
RE: "THE GENERAL EPIDEMIOLOGIST: IS THERE A PLACE IN TODAY'S EPIDEMIOLOGY?"
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2008; 167(3): 375 - 376.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
C. S. Lea
RE: "THE GENERAL EPIDEMIOLOGIST: IS THERE A PLACE IN TODAY'S EPIDEMIOLOGY?"
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2008; 167(3): 375 - 375.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.