Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on December 5, 2006
American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 165(4):444-452; doi:10.1093/aje/kwk027
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
165/4/444    most recent
kwk027v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howards, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Poole, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Howards, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Poole, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Copyright © 2006 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health All rights reserved; printed in U.S.A.

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Conditions for Bias from Differential Left Truncation

Penelope P. Howards1, Irva Hertz-Picciotto2 and Charles Poole3

1 Division of Epidemiology, Statistics and Prevention Research, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Rockville, MD
2 Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, University of California, Davis, CA
3 Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC

Correspondence to Dr. Penelope P. Howards, Division of Epidemiology, Statistics and Prevention Research, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 7B03C MSC 7510, Rockville, MD 20852 (e-mail: howardsp{at}mail.nih.gov).

Received for publication October 25, 2005. Accepted for publication July 19, 2006.

Spontaneous abortion studies that recruit pregnant women are left truncated because an unknown proportion of the source population experiences losses prior to enrollment. Unconditional logistic regression, commonly used in such studies, ignores left truncation, whereas survival analysis can accommodate left truncation and is therefore more appropriate. This study assessed the magnitude of bias introduced by fitting logistic versus Cox models using left-truncated data from a 1998 US pregnancy cohort study (n = 5,104) of trihalomethanes and spontaneous abortion. In addition, the conditions producing bias were explored by using simulated exposure data. The odds ratios and hazard ratios from the actual study differed by 10% or less. However, when the exposed women entered observation earlier on average than those unexposed, the hazard ratio was closer to the null than the odds ratio, whereas the reverse was true when the exposed entered later. The simulation suggests that bias in the odds ratio will exceed 20% when average gestational age at entry for the exposed versus the unexposed differs by 10 days or more, as has been observed regarding some socioeconomic factors, such as education and ethnicity. Cox regression can correct for left truncation and is no more difficult to perform than logistic regression.

abortion, spontaneous; bias (epidemiology); logistic models; survival analysis; trihalomethanes


Abbreviations: TTHM, total trihalomethane


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Jadersten, L. Malcovati, I. Dybedal, M. Giovanni Della Porta, R. Invernizzi, S. M. Montgomery, C. Pascutto, A. Porwit, M. Cazzola, and E. Hellstrom-Lindberg
Erythropoietin and Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor Treatment Associated With Improved Survival in Myelodysplastic Syndrome
J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2008; 26(21): 3607 - 3613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.