Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on August 21, 2006
American Journal of Epidemiology 2006 164(7):697-705; doi:10.1093/aje/kwj256
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
164/7/697    most recent
kwj256v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yasui, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Egan, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yasui, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Egan, K. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Copyright © 2006 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health All rights reserved; printed in U.S.A.

Practice of Epidemiology

Familial Relative Risk Estimates for Use in Epidemiologic Analyses

Yutaka Yasui1, Polly A. Newcomb2,3, Amy Trentham-Dietz3 and Kathleen M. Egan4

1 Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
2 Cancer Prevention Program, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
3 University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, WI
4 Vanderbilt University School of Medicine and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN

Correspondence to Dr. Yutaka Yasui, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Alberta, 13-106J Clinical Sciences Building, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G3, Canada (e-mail: yyasui{at}ualberta.ca).

Commonly used crude measures of disease risk or relative risk in a family, such as the presence/absence of disease or the number of affected relatives, do not take into account family structures and ages at disease occurrence. The Family History Score incorporates these factors and has been used widely in epidemiology. However, the Family History Score is not an estimate of familial relative risk; rather, it corresponds to a measure of statistical significance against a null hypothesis that the family's disease risk is equal to that expected from reference rates. In this paper, the authors consider an estimate of familial relative risk using the empirical Bayes framework. The approach uses a two-level hierarchical model in which the first level models familial relative risk and the second considers a Poisson count of the number of affected relatives given the familial relative risk from the first level. The authors illustrate the utility of this methodology in a large, population-based case-control study of breast cancer, showing that, compared with commonly used summaries of family history including the Family History Score, the new estimates are more strongly associated with case-control status and more clearly detect effect modification of an environmental risk factor by familial relative risk.

Bayes theorem; family; Poisson distribution; regression analysis; risk


Abbreviations: AFB, age at first birth; CBCS II, Collaborative Breast Cancer Study II; FSIR, Familial Standardized Incidence Ratio; MLE, maximum likelihood estimator


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
E. Kampman
A First-Degree Relative with Colorectal Cancer: What Are We Missing?
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2007; 16(1): 1 - 3.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.