American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on June 19, 2006
American Journal of Epidemiology 2006 164(3):292-293; doi:10.1093/aje/kwj221
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
American Journal of Epidemiology Copyright © 2006 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health All rights reserved; printed in U.S.A.
Letter to the Editor |
RE: "BAYESIAN PROJECTIONS: WHAT ARE THE EFFECTS OF EXCLUDING DATA FROM YOUNGER AGE GROUPS?"
1 National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
2 Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research, Finnish Cancer Registry, FI-00170 Helsinki, Finland
3 Biostatistics Modeling and Methods, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109
(e-mail: mark.clements@anu.edu.au)
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Baker and Bray (1
) continue Bray's thoughtful development of a particular Bayesian age-period-cohort model for cancer rate projections. This model has an elegant formulation and has brought to the forefront a Bayesian interpretation of cancer projections. However, we feel that there are more appropriate