Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on January 12, 2006
American Journal of Epidemiology 2006 163(5):397-403; doi:10.1093/aje/kwj062
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
163/5/397    most recent
kwj062v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nitsch, D.
Right arrow Articles by Leon, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nitsch, D.
Right arrow Articles by Leon, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Copyright © 2006 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health All rights reserved; printed in U.S.A.

Special Article

Limits to Causal Inference based on Mendelian Randomization: A Comparison with Randomized Controlled Trials

Dorothea Nitsch, Mariam Molokhia, Liam Smeeth, Bianca L. DeStavola, John C. Whittaker and David A. Leon

From the Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom

Correspondence to Dr. Dorothea Nitsch, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom (e-mail: Dorothea.Nitsch{at}lshtm.ac.uk).

"Mendelian randomization" refers to the random assortment of genes transferred from parent to offspring at the time of gamete formation. This process has been compared to a randomized controlled trial of genetic variants. This could greatly aid observational epidemiology by potentially allowing an unbiased estimate of the effects of gene products on disease outcomes. However, studies utilizing Mendelian randomization to estimate effects of gene products on outcomes should be interpreted with caution. In this paper, the authors discuss some of the challenges facing epidemiologists in the analysis and interpretation of Mendelian randomization studies, particularly those that become apparent when the analogy with randomized controlled trials is closely examined. The authors conclude that Mendelian randomization is a powerful addition to etiologic research tools. However, care must be taken, because drawing valid causal inferences from its application depends upon more extensive assumptions than are required in randomized controlled trials.

causality; epidemiologic methods; genetics; random allocation; randomized controlled trials


Abbreviations: ITT, intention-to-treat; IV, instrumental variable; MTHFR, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
Y. Wu, H. Li, R. J. F. Loos, Q. Qi, F. B. Hu, Y. Liu, and X. Lin
RBP4 variants are significantly associated with plasma RBP4 levels and hypertriglyceridemia risk in Chinese Hans
J. Lipid Res., July 1, 2009; 50(7): 1479 - 1486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
P. R. Kamstrup, A. Tybjaerg-Hansen, R. Steffensen, and B. G. Nordestgaard
Genetically Elevated Lipoprotein(a) and Increased Risk of Myocardial Infarction
JAMA, June 10, 2009; 301(22): 2331 - 2339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
D. I. Chasman, G. Pare, and P. M Ridker
Population-Based Genomewide Genetic Analysis of Common Clinical Chemistry Analytes
Clin. Chem., January 1, 2009; 55(1): 39 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. Zacho, A. Tybjaerg-Hansen, J. S. Jensen, P. Grande, H. Sillesen, and B. G. Nordestgaard
Genetically Elevated C-Reactive Protein and Ischemic Vascular Disease
N. Engl. J. Med., October 30, 2008; 359(18): 1897 - 1908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M. Bochud
On the use of Mendelian randomization to infer causality in observational epidemiology
Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2008; 29(20): 2456 - 2457.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
T. M Palmer, J. R Thompson, M. D Tobin, N. A Sheehan, and P. R Burton
Adjusting for bias and unmeasured confounding in Mendelian randomization studies with binary responses
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2008; 37(5): 1161 - 1168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. Frikke-Schmidt, B. G. Nordestgaard, M. C. A. Stene, A. A. Sethi, A. T. Remaley, P. Schnohr, P. Grande, and A. Tybjaerg-Hansen
Association of Loss-of-Function Mutations in the ABCA1 Gene With High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels and Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease
JAMA, June 4, 2008; 299(21): 2524 - 2532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. Schnabel, M. G. Larson, J. Dupuis, K. L. Lunetta, I. Lipinska, J. B. Meigs, X. Yin, J. Rong, J. A. Vita, C. Newton-Cheh, et al.
Relations of Inflammatory Biomarkers and Common Genetic Variants With Arterial Stiffness and Wave Reflection
Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): 1651 - 1657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M. Bochud, A. Chiolero, R. C Elston, and F. Paccaud
A cautionary note on the use of Mendelian randomization to infer causation in observational epidemiology
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2008; 37(2): 414 - 416.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
N. Krieger
Proximal, Distal, and the Politics of Causation: What's Level Got to Do With It?
Am J Public Health, February 1, 2008; 98(2): 221 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
V. Didelez and N. Sheehan
Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, August 1, 2007; 16(4): 309 - 330.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
H Campbell and T Manolio
Commentary: Rare alleles, modest genetic effects and the need for collaboration
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 30, 2007; (2007) dym055v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M. J Khoury, J. Little, M. Gwinn, and J. P. Ioannidis
On the synthesis and interpretation of consistent but weak gene-disease associations in the era of genome-wide association studies
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2007; 36(2): 439 - 445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
A. Dehghan, I. Kardys, M. P.M. de Maat, A. G. Uitterlinden, E. J.G. Sijbrands, A. H. Bootsma, T. Stijnen, A. Hofman, M. T. Schram, and J. C.M. Witteman
Genetic Variation, C-Reactive Protein Levels, and Incidence of Diabetes
Diabetes, March 1, 2007; 56(3): 872 - 878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
J. Olsen
How to study cancers with a possible intrauterine etiology
Eur. J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2006; 155(suppl_1): S59 - S64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
H. S. Markus, R. Labrum, S. Bevan, M. Reindl, G. Egger, C. J. Wiedermann, Q. Xu, S. Kiechl, and J. Willeit
Genetic and Acquired Inflammatory Conditions Are Synergistically Associated With Early Carotid Atherosclerosis
Stroke, September 1, 2006; 37(9): 2253 - 2259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
R. J Glynn
Commentary: Genes as instruments for evaluation of markers and causes
Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2006; 35(4): 932 - 934.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
T. W Meade, S. E Humphries, and B. L De Stavola
Commentary: Fibrinogen and coronary heart disease--test of causality by 'Mendelian' randomization by Keavney et al.
Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2006; 35(4): 944 - 947.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.