Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on December 21, 2005
American Journal of Epidemiology 2006 163(3):262-270; doi:10.1093/aje/kwj047
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
163/3/262    most recent
kwj047v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kurth, T.
Right arrow Articles by Robins, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kurth, T.
Right arrow Articles by Robins, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Copyright © 2005 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health All rights reserved; printed in U.S.A.

Original Contribution

Results of Multivariable Logistic Regression, Propensity Matching, Propensity Adjustment, and Propensity-based Weighting under Conditions of Nonuniform Effect

Tobias Kurth1,2,3, Alexander M. Walker3,4, Robert J. Glynn1,5,6, K. Arnold Chan3,4, J. Michael Gaziano1,2,7, Klaus Berger8 and James M. Robins3,6

1 Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
2 Division of Aging, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
3 Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
4 i3 Drug Safety, Auburndale, MA
5 Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
6 Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
7 Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, Boston VA Healthcare System, Boston, MA
8 Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany

Correspondence to Dr. Tobias Kurth, Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, Boston, MA 02120 (e-mail: tkurth{at}rics.bwh.harvard.edu).

Observational studies often provide the only available information about treatment effects. Control of confounding, however, remains challenging. The authors compared five methods for evaluating the effect of tissue plasminogen activator on death among 6,269 ischemic stroke patients registered in a German stroke registry: multivariable logistic regression, propensity score–matched analysis, regression adjustment with the propensity score, and two propensity score–based weighted methods—one estimating the treatment effect in the entire study population (inverse-probability-of-treatment weights), another in the treated population (standardized-mortality-ratio weights). Between 2000 and 2001, 212 patients received tissue plasminogen activator. The crude odds ratio between tissue plasminogen activator and death was 3.35 (95% confidence interval: 2.28, 4.91). The adjusted odds ratio depended strongly on the adjustment method, ranging from 1.11 (95% confidence interval: 0.67, 1.84) for the standardized-mortality-ratio weighted to 10.77 (95% confidence interval: 2.47, 47.04) for the inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighted analysis. For treated patients with a low propensity score, risks of dying were high. Exclusion of patients with a propensity score of <5% yielded comparable odds ratios of approximately 1 for all methods. High levels of nonuniform treatment effect render summary estimates very sensitive to the weighting system explicit or implicit in an adjustment technique. Researchers need to be clear about the population for which an overall treatment estimate is most suitable.

causality; cerebrovascular accident; confounding factors (epidemiology); data interpretation, statistical; logistic models; models, statistical; observational study


Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; IPTW, inverse-probability-of-treatment weighted; SMR, standardized mortality ratio; t-PA, tissue plasminogen activator


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. Kurth, C. Tzourio, and M.-G. Bousser
Migraine: A Matter of the Heart?
Circulation, September 30, 2008; 118(14): 1405 - 1407.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BiometrikaHome page
B. B. Hansen
The prognostic analogue of the propensity score
Biometrika, June 1, 2008; 95(2): 481 - 488.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
C. Schmoor, A. Caputo, and M. Schumacher
Evidence from Nonrandomized Studies: A Case Study on the Estimation of Causal Effects
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 1, 2008; 167(9): 1120 - 1129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. J. Bos, P. J. Koudstaal, A. Hofman, and M. M.B. Breteler
Decreased Glomerular Filtration Rate Is a Risk Factor for Hemorrhagic But Not for Ischemic Stroke: The Rotterdam Study
Stroke, December 1, 2007; 38(12): 3127 - 3132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
R. Mansson, M. M. Joffe, W. Sun, and S. Hennessy
On the Estimation and Use of Propensity Scores in Case-Control and Case-Cohort Studies
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2007; 166(3): 332 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
T. Kurth, P. U. Heuschmann, A. M. Walker, K. Berger, M. L. Flaherty, B. Kissela, P. Khatri, R. M. Dubinsky, and S. M. Lai
Mortality of stroke patients treated with thrombolysis: Analysis of nationwide inpatient sample
Neurology, February 27, 2007; 68(9): 710 - 711.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.