SPECIAL ARTICLE |
Use of a Bayesian Approach to Decide When to Stop a Therapeutic Trial: The Case of a Chemoprophylaxis Trial in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection
1 INSERM U 593, Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, France
2 INSERM E 0338, Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, France
3 Regional Hospital Center, Laboratory of Bacteriology-Virology, Montpellier, France
Correspondence to Dr. Alphonse Kpozèhouen, INSERM U 593, Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, 146, rue Léo-Saignat, 33076 Bordeaux Cedex, France (e-mail: Alphonse.Kpozehouen{at}isped.u-bordeaux2.fr).
From 1996 to 1998, a phase III, placebo-controlled, therapeutic trial was conducted in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, to assess the efficacy of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis in reducing severe morbidity in adults at early stages of human immunodeficiency virus infection. The authors used the real data from this trial to simulate three Bayesian interim analyses. Three prior distributions were considered: a noninformative one, a skeptical one, and one based on external information. The posterior distribution was calculated by using directed acyclic graphs and Gibbs sampling. This Bayesian approach showed different results according to the prior distribution chosen. Although use of the noninformative prior would have led to stopping the trial at the same time that the frequentist approach would have, the skeptical prior would have led to continuing it, and the prior based on external data would have led to stopping it 1 year earlier.
Bayesian approach; cotrimoxazole; counting process; Cox model; directed acyclic graph; Gibbs sampling
Abbreviations: ANRS Agence Nationale de Recherche sur le Sida; CI Côte d'Ivoire; HIV human immunodeficiency virus
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. A. H. van Noord and I. van der Tweel RE: "USE OF A BAYESIAN APPROACH TO DECIDE WHEN TO STOP A THERAPEUTIC TRIAL: THE CASE OF A CHEMOPROPHYLAXIS TRIAL IN HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION" Am. J. Epidemiol., November 15, 2005; 162(10): 1033 - 1035. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
