Copyright © 2005 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY |
Quality of Reporting of Observational Longitudinal Research
1 School of Population Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
2 Population Studies and Human Genetics Division, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Observational longitudinal research is particularly useful for assessing etiology and prognosis and for providing evidence for clinical decision making. However, there are no structured reporting requirements for studies of this design to assist authors, editors, and readers. The authors developed and tested a checklist of criteria related to threats to the internal and external validity of observational longitudinal studies. The checklist criteria concerned recruitment, data collection, biases, and data analysis and descriptive issues relevant to study rationale, study population, and generalizability. Two raters independently assessed 49 randomly selected articles describing stroke research published from 1999 to 2003 in six journals: American Journal of Epidemiology, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, Stroke, Annals of Neurology, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. On average, 17 of the 33 checklist criteria were reported. Criteria describing the study design were better reported than those related to internal validity. No relation was found between study type (etiologic or prognostic) or word count and quality of reporting. A flow diagram for summarizing participant flow through a study was developed. Editors and authors should consider using a checklist and flow diagram when reporting on observational longitudinal research.
epidemiologic factors; longitudinal studies
Abbreviations: CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; SD, standard deviation.
Correspondence to Dr. Leigh Tooth, School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Herston Medical School, Herston, Queensland, 4006 Australia (e-mail: L.tooth{at}sph.uq.edu.au).
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Drotar Editorial: How to Write an Effective Results and Discussion for the Journal of Pediatric Psychology J. Pediatr. Psychol., May 1, 2009; 34(4): 339 - 343. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Drotar Editorial: How to Report Methods in the Journal of Pediatric Psychology J. Pediatr. Psychol., April 1, 2009; 34(3): 227 - 230. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E Kho, M. Duffett, D. J Willison, D. J Cook, and M. C Brouwers Written informed consent and selection bias in observational studies using medical records: systematic review BMJ, March 12, 2009; 338(mar12_2): b866 - b866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. H. Morrell, L. J. Brant, and L. Ferrucci Model Choice Can Obscure Results in Longitudinal Studies J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, February 5, 2009; (2009) gln024v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Knol, J. P. Vandenbroucke, P. Scott, and M. Egger What Do Case-Control Studies Estimate? Survey of Methods and Assumptions in Published Case-Control Research Am. J. Epidemiol., November 1, 2008; 168(9): 1073 - 1081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Ding, N Patton, I J Deary, M W J Strachan, F G R Fowkes, R J Mitchell, and J F Price Retinal microvascular abnormalities and cognitive dysfunction: a systematic review Br J Ophthalmol, August 1, 2008; 92(8): 1017 - 1025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. O'Neil and T. A. Nicklas A Review of the Relationship Between 100% Fruit Juice Consumption and Weight in Children and Adolescents American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, July 1, 2008; 2(4): 315 - 354. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. E. Bekkering, R. J. Harris, S. Thomas, A.-M. B. Mayer, R. Beynon, A. R. Ness, R. M. Harbord, C. Bain, G. D. Smith, and J. A. C. Sterne How Much of the Data Published in Observational Studies of the Association between Diet and Prostate or Bladder Cancer Is Usable for Meta-Analysis? Am. J. Epidemiol., May 1, 2008; 167(9): 1017 - 1026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. van der Jagt, P. J. Koudstaal, D. W.J. Dippel, and J. D. F. Habbema Methodological Quality and Publication Bias in Observational Studies on Risk of Rupture of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Stroke, January 1, 2008; 39(1): e11 - e11. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. v. Elm, D. G Altman, M. Egger, S. J Pocock, P. C Gotzsche, J. P Vandenbroucke, and STROBE Initiative Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies BMJ, October 20, 2007; 335(7624): 806 - 808. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. von Elm, D. G. Altman, M. Egger, S. J. Pocock, P. C. Gotzsche, J. P. Vandenbroucke, and for the STROBE Initiative The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies Ann Intern Med, October 16, 2007; 147(8): 573 - 577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Vandenbroucke, E. v. Elm, D. G. Altman, P. C. Gotzsche, C. D. Mulrow, S. J. Pocock, C. Poole, J. J. Schlesselman, M. Egger, and for the STROBE initiative Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration Ann Intern Med, October 16, 2007; 147(8): W-163 - W-194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Morton, J. Cahill, and P. Hartge Reporting Participation in Epidemiologic Studies: A Survey of Practice Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2006; 163(3): 197 - 203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Des Jarlais, C. M. Lyles, and N. Crepaz RE: "QUALITY OF REPORTING OF OBSERVATIONAL LONGITUDINAL RESEARCH" Am. J. Epidemiol., November 15, 2005; 162(10): 1032 - 1032. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Tooth, R. Ware, C. Bain, D. Purdie, and A. Dobson THE AUTHORS REPLY Am. J. Epidemiol., November 15, 2005; 162(10): 1033 - 1033. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. von Elm, D. G. Altman, S. Pocock, J. P. Vandenbroucke, and M. Egger RE: "QUALITY OF REPORTING OF OBSERVATIONAL LONGITUDINAL RESEARCH" Am. J. Epidemiol., November 15, 2005; 162(10): 1032 - 1033. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||







