Skip Navigation

American Journal of Epidemiology 2004 160(5):475-483; doi:10.1093/aje/kwh245
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brennan, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dmochowski, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brennan, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dmochowski, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2004 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Factors Associated with Treatment Initiation after Osteoporosis Screening

Renee M. Brennan1 , Jean Wactawski-Wende1,2, Carlos J. Crespo1 and Jacek Dmochowski3

1 Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
2 Department of Gynecology/Obstetrics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
3 Department of Mathematics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC.

The prevalence of osteoporosis and factors associated with treatment initiation after detection of osteoporosis were determined for previously unscreened, postmenopausal women. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry screening was conducted in 1997–2000 as part of an ancillary study of the Buffalo, New York, center of the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. A total of 945 women were previously unaware of their bone density, although, for 344 (36.4%), osteoporosis was newly detected through screening (T-score ≤ –2.5). Of those women, 250 (72.7%) discussed the results with a health care provider, and 140 (56.0%) initiated treatment after doing so. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, factors associated with treatment initiation were T-score (odds ratio (OR) = 0.39 per unit increase, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.23, 0.67), routine medical care more often than yearly (OR = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.12, 3.86), college education (OR = 2.58, 95% CI: 1.25, 5.31), family income of ≥$50,000 (OR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.03, 4.14), and discussing screening results with a gynecologist (OR = 3.20, 95% CI: 1.33, 7.67). These findings suggest that many postmenopausal women are unaware of their bone density and could benefit from screening. In this study, approximately half of the women with osteoporosis initiated treatment after screening. Disease severity, medical care frequency, education, income, and physician type predicted treatment initiation.

bone density; densitometry; diagnosis; drug therapy; mass screening; osteoporosis, postmenopause; risk factors

Abbreviations: Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; DXA, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; OR, odds ratio.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
K. M. McLeod, S. E. McCann, P. J. Horvath, and J. Wactawski-Wende
Predictors of Change in Calcium Intake in Postmenopausal Women after Osteoporosis Screening
J. Nutr., August 1, 2007; 137(8): 1968 - 1973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.