Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S.
Right arrow Articles by Popkin, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S.
Right arrow Articles by Popkin, B. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Am J Epidemiol 2004; 159:184-191.
Copyright © 2004 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Contrasting Socioeconomic Profiles Related to Healthier Lifestyles in China and the United States

Soowon Kim1, Michael Symons2 and Barry M. Popkin1 

1 Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
2 Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.

Health disparity by socioeconomic status has recently become an important public health concern. Socioeconomic status may affect health status through several pathways including lifestyle choices. The authors tested the link between socioeconomic status and lifestyle in China (in 1993) and in the United States (in 1994–1996), countries with high contrasts in development, to understand health discrepancy issues cross-nationally. Healthfulness of lifestyle was measured using the Lifestyle Index, a summary score that integrates four key lifestyle factors: diet, physical activity, smoking, and alcohol consumption. Income and education were used as indicators of socioeconomic status. In China, as socioeconomic status improved, lifestyle was less healthy (relative odds for the highest socioeconomic status group = 0.19, 95% confidence interval: 0.10, 0.35). Conversely, in the United States, higher socioeconomic status was related to a healthier lifestyle (relative odds for the highest socioeconomic status group = 3.81, 95% confidence interval: 2.94, 4.94). The contrasting relation between socioeconomic status and lifestyle depicts different phases of the lifestyle transition (changes in lifestyles accompanying economic development). The differences may in part explain why nutrition-related noncommunicable diseases are more prevalent in the developing world among people with a high socioeconomic status, whereas often the opposite is found in developed societies. Public health programs may benefit by advising each socioeconomic status group separately, while considering the country’s level of development.

China; education; health; income; life style; socioeconomic factors; United States


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
A. L. Brown, A. J. Khattak, and D. A. Rodriguez
Neighbourhood Types, Travel and Body Mass: A Study of New Urbanist and Suburban Neighbourhoods in the US
Urban Stud, April 1, 2008; 45(4): 963 - 988.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
M. R. French, F. Vernace-Inserra, and G. A. Hawker
A Prospective Study to Identify Factors Affecting Adherence to Recommended Daily Calcium Intake in Women with Low Bone Mineral Density
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., February 1, 2008; 27(1): 88 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Education JournalHome page
C. Gidlow, L. H. Johnston, D. Crone, N. Ellis, and D. James
A systematic review of the relationship between socio-economic position and physical activity
Health Education Journal, December 1, 2006; 65(4): 338 - 367.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
X. Ponce, E. Ramirez, and H. Delisle
A More Diversified Diet among Mexican Men May Also Be More Atherogenic
J. Nutr., November 1, 2006; 136(11): 2921 - 2927.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
Y.-M. Song, R. L. Ferrer, S.-i. Cho, J. Sung, S. Ebrahim, and G. Davey Smith
Socioeconomic Status and Cardiovascular Disease Among Men: The Korean National Health Service Prospective Cohort Study
Am J Public Health, January 1, 2006; 96(1): 152 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
T. Braaten, E. Weiderpass, M. Kumle, and E. Lund
Explaining the Socioeconomic Variation in Cancer Risk in the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2005; 14(11): 2591 - 2597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
T H Lu, T L Chiang, and J W Lynch
What can we learn from international comparisons of social inequalities in road traffic injury mortality?
Inj. Prev., June 1, 2005; 11(3): 131 - 133.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
Y.-H. Khang and H. R. Kim
Explaining socioeconomic inequality in mortality among South Koreans: an examination of multiple pathways in a nationally representative longitudinal study
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2005; 34(3): 630 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
Y.-M. Song, R. L. Ferrer, S.-i. Cho, J. Sung, S. Ebrahim, and G. Davey Smith
Socioeconomic Status and Cardiovascular Disease Among Men: The Korean National Health Service Prospective Cohort Study
Am J Public Health, January 1, 2006; 96(1): 152 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.