Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (42)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hauptmann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Blair, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hauptmann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Blair, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Am J Epidemiol 2004; 159:1117-1130.
Copyright © 2004 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Mortality from Solid Cancers among Workers in Formaldehyde Industries

Michael Hauptmann , Jay H. Lubin, Patricia A. Stewart, Richard B. Hayes and Aaron Blair

From the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD.

In industrial workers, formaldehyde exposure has been associated with cancer of the nasal cavities, nasopharynx, prostate, lung, and pancreas; however, these associations are inconsistent and remain controversial. Animals exposed to formaldehyde show excesses of nasal cancer. In an extended follow-up of a large cohort of formaldehyde-exposed workers, the authors evaluated mortality from solid cancers (1,921 deaths) among 25,619 workers (865,708 person-years) employed in 10 US formaldehyde-producing or -using facilities through 1994. Exposure assessment included quantitative estimates of formaldehyde exposure. Standardized mortality ratios and relative risks were calculated. Compared with that for the US population, mortality from solid cancers was significantly lower than expected among subjects exposed and nonexposed to formaldehyde (standardized mortality ratios = 0.91 and 0.78, respectively). Relative risks for nasopharyngeal cancer (nine deaths) increased with average exposure intensity, cumulative exposure, highest peak exposure, and duration of exposure to formaldehyde (p-trend = 0.066, 0.025, <0.001, and 0.147, respectively). Formaldehyde exposure did not appear to be associated with lung (744 deaths), pancreas (93 deaths), or brain (62 deaths) cancer. Although relative risks for prostate cancer (145 deaths) were elevated for some measures of formaldehyde exposure, the trend was inconsistent. In this cohort of formaldehyde-industry workers, some evidence was found of an exposure-response relation with mortality from nasopharyngeal cancer (based on small numbers) but not for cancers of the pancreas, brain, lung, or prostate.

carcinogens; cohort studies; formaldehyde; lung; mortality; nasopharynx; neoplasms; occupational health

Abbreviations: Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; SMR, standardized mortality ratio.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol Ind HealthHome page
M. Sandikci, K. Seyrek, H. Aksit, and H. Kose
Inhalation of formaldehyde and xylene induces apoptotic cell death in the lung tissue
Toxicology and Industrial Health, August 1, 2009; 25(7): 455 - 461.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
L. E. Beane Freeman, A. Blair, J. H. Lubin, P. A. Stewart, R. B. Hayes, R. N. Hoover, and M. Hauptmann
Mortality From Lymphohematopoietic Malignancies Among Workers in Formaldehyde Industries: The National Cancer Institute Cohort
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 20, 2009; 101(10): 751 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
B Pesch, C B Pierl, M Gebel, I Gross, D Becker, G Johnen, H-P Rihs, K Donhuijsen, V Lepentsiotis, M Meier, et al.
Occupational risks for adenocarcinoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses in the German wood industry
Occup. Environ. Med., March 1, 2008; 65(3): 191 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
C. Bosetti, J. K. McLaughlin, R. E. Tarone, E. Pira, and C. La Vecchia
Formaldehyde and cancer risk: a quantitative review of cohort studies through 2006
Ann. Onc., January 1, 2008; 19(1): 29 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
W. Wang, J. Xu, L. Xu, B. Yue, and F. Zou
The instability of (GpT)n and (ApC)n microsatellites induced by formaldehyde in Escherichia coli
Mutagenesis, September 1, 2007; 22(5): 353 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
jvmeHome page
V. Nacher, C. Llombart, A. Carretero, M. Navarro, P. Ysern, S. Calero, E. Figols, and J. Ruberte
A New System to Reduce Formaldehyde Levels Improves Safety Conditions during Gross Veterinary Anatomy Learning
J Vet Med Educ, January 1, 2007; 34(2): 168 - 171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
A. M. Jeffrey, M. J. Iatropoulos, and G. M. Williams
Nasal Cytotoxic and Carcinogenic Activities of Systemically Distributed Organic Chemicals
Toxicol Pathol, December 1, 2006; 34(7): 827 - 852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
E. T. Chang and H.-O. Adami
The enigmatic epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2006; 15(10): 1765 - 1777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
R. E. Tarone and J. K. McLaughlin
Re: "Mortality from Solid Cancers among Workers in Formaldehyde Industries"
Am. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2005; 161(11): 1089 - 1090.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. Hauptmann, J. H. Lubin, P. A. Stewart, R. B. Hayes, and A. Blair
The Authors Reply
Am. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2005; 161(11): 1090 - 1091.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.