Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Am. J. Epidemiol.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hebert, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hebert, J. R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Am J Epidemiol 2003; 158:617-620.
Copyright © 2003 by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Invited Commentary: Menthol Cigarettes and Risk of Lung Cancer

James R. Hebert1,2 

1 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
2 South Carolina Cancer Center, Columbia, SC.

Received for publication June 16, 2003; accepted for publication June 24, 2003.

Abbreviations: Abbreviations: NPCR, National Program of Cancer Registries; SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results.

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.


   INTRODUCTION
 
The paper by Brooks et al. (1) in this issue of the American Journal of Epidemiology addresses a topic of considerable public health importance and academic interest. It contributes to our understanding about the role of mentholated cigarettes in lung carcinogenesis, and it forces us to consider methodological issues that need to be addressed if we are to continue research on this topic.

Historical context and lung cancer rate disparities
The association between lung cancer and cigarette smoking was first established with the publication of several important papers in the middle of the last century (2–4). A decade and a half later, the 1964 US Surgeon General’s report on Smoking and Health (5) provided a clear and definitive judgment on the challenge of smoking, which continues to play an important role in public health, individuals’ pain and suffering, and domestic and foreign politics (6–9).

Despite . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Mentholated cigarette use
Measurement and study design issues
Conclusion

   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Am. J. Epidemiol.:

Menthol Cigarettes and Risk of Lung Cancer
Daniel R. Brooks, Julie R. Palmer, Brian L. Strom, and Lynn Rosenberg
Am. J. Epidemiol. 2003 158: 609-616. [Abstract] [FREE Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. R. Hebert, H. M. Brandt, C. A. Armstead, S. A. Adams, and S. E. Steck
Interdisciplinary, Translational, and Community-Based Participatory Research: Finding a Common Language to Improve Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2009; 18(4): 1213 - 1217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
A. J. Alberg, J. G. Ford, and J. M. Samet
Epidemiology of Lung Cancer: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition)
Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 29S - 55S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
A. J. Alberg, M. V. Brock, and J. M. Samet
Epidemiology of Lung Cancer: Looking to the Future
J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2005; 23(14): 3175 - 3185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]