Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Penberthy, L.
Right arrow Articles by Retchin, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Penberthy, L.
Right arrow Articles by Retchin, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Am J Epidemiol 2003; 158:27-34.
Copyright © 2003 by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health


PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

Using Hospital Discharge Files to Enhance Cancer Surveillance

Lynne Penberthy1 , Donna McClish2, Amy Pugh3, Wally Smith1, Claudine Manning1 and Sheldon Retchin1

1 Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
2 Department of Biostatistics, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
3 Virginia Cancer Registry, Division of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Virginia Department of Health, Richmond, VA.

Use of the traditional mechanism for cancer surveillance, hospital-based registries, may limit ascertainment of incident cases. In this study, the authors evaluated the ability of a statewide hospital discharge file (HDF) to enhance central cancer registry reporting. Incident cancers from a Virginia cancer registry were linked with an HDF for 1995. Medical record abstractions for over 2,000 cancers verified HDF and registry data. There were 19,740 unique cases ascertained from the two combined data sources. The registry captured approximately 83% of cases, while the HDF captured 62%. Although the HDF missed a substantial number of registry cases, the HDF positive predictive value for identifying the correct cancer site was 94%. Logistic regression was used to identify significant characteristics of cases likely to be captured only by the HDF; these characteristics included hospital cancer program certification, the position of the cancer diagnosis on the claim, and cancer surgery. This study represents the evaluation of a novel approach to enhancing registry completeness and accuracy using statewide HDFs. The results strongly suggest that neither a central cancer registry nor an HDF is a sufficient source for complete capture of cases. Using HDFs to supplement a central cancer registry may be a valuable and efficient method for improving registry completeness of reporting.

hospital records; neoplasms; population surveillance; registries

Abbreviations: Abbreviations: ACOS, American College of Surgeons; HDF, hospital discharge file; ICD-9-CM, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification; VCR, Virginia Cancer Registry.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
H. J. Murff, D. R. Spigel, and S. Syngal
Does This Patient Have a Family History of Cancer?: An Evidence-Based Analysis of the Accuracy of Family Cancer History
JAMA, September 22, 2004; 292(12): 1480 - 1489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.