Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rich-Edwards, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gillman, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rich-Edwards, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gillman, M. W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157:665-666.
Copyright © 2003 by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

RE: "BIRTH SIZE, GROWTH, AND BLOOD PRESSURE BETWEEN THE AGES OF 7 AND 26 YEARS: FAILURE TO SUPPORT THE FETAL ORIGINS HYPOTHESIS"

Janet W. Rich-Edwards, Ken P. Kleinman and Matthew W. Gillman

Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, MA 02215

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

In a recent issue of the Journal, Williams and Poulton concluded that their analysis of birth weight, adult weight, and blood pressure failed to support the "fetal origins hypothesis" (1). In fact, they misinterpreted their . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?