Am J Epidemiol 2002; 156:857-861.
Copyright © 2002 by Johns
Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS |
Risk of Severe Cardiac Arrhythmia in Male Utility Workers: A Nationwide Danish Cohort Study
1 Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
2 Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
3 Danish Pacemaker and ICD Register, Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
To address concern about the potential cardiovascular effects of occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in the 50- to 60-Hz frequency band, the authors launched an epidemiologic study of the incidence of severe cardiac arrhythmia, as indicated by the need for a pacemaker, in a nationwide cohort of Danish utility workers. The cohort of 24,056 men employed at utility companies between 1900 and 1993 was linked to the nationwide, population-based Danish Pacemaker Register, and the numbers of persons who had undergone pacemaker implantation between 1982 and 2000 were compared with corresponding numbers in the general population. In addition, the data on the utility workers were fitted to a multiplicative Poisson regression model in relation to estimated levels of exposure to 50-Hz electromagnetic fields. Overall, based on 135 men with pacemakers (140 expected), there was no increased risk of severe cardiac arrhythmia among the utility employees; the risk estimate was 0.96 (95% confidence interval: 0.81, 1.14). No clear dose-response pattern emerged with increasing levels of exposure to electromagnetic fields or with duration of employment. These results are largely reassuring, since they do not support the hypothesis of a link between occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields and an excess risk of severe cardiovascular arrhythmia leading to permanent implantation of a pacemaker.
arrhythmia; electricity; electromagnetic fields; occupational exposure; pacemaker, artificial
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L Kheifets, J D Bowman, H Checkoway, M Feychting, J M Harrington, R Kavet, G Marsh, G Mezei, D C Renew, and E van Wijngaarden Future needs of occupational epidemiology of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields: review and recommendations Occup. Environ. Med., February 1, 2009; 66(2): 72 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Johansen, O. Raaschou Nielsen, J. H Olsen, and J. Schuz Risk for leukaemia and brain and breast cancer among Danish utility workers: a second follow-up Occup. Environ. Med., November 1, 2007; 64(11): 782 - 784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Seidler, P. Geller, A. Nienhaus, T. Bernhardt, I. Ruppe, S. Eggert, M. Hietanen, T. Kauppinen, and L. Frolich Occupational exposure to low frequency magnetic fields and dementia: a case-control study Occup. Environ. Med., February 1, 2007; 64(2): 108 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Ahlbom and M. Feychting Electromagnetic radiation: Environmental pollution and health Br. Med. Bull., December 1, 2003; 68(1): 157 - 165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|