Am J Epidemiol 2002; 156:753-760.
Copyright © 2002 by the
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY |
Modeling Treatment Effects on Binary Outcomes with Grouped-Treatment Variables and Individual Covariates
1 Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
2 Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
3 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
During evaluation of treatment effects in observational studies, confounding is a constant threat because it is always possible that patients with a better prognosis, not adequately characterized by measured covariates, are chosen for a specific therapy. Ecologic analyses may avoid confounding that would be present in analysis at the individual level because variations in regional or hospital practice may be unrelated to prognosis. The authors used simulated data with an excluded confounder to evaluate the reliability and limitations of the grouped-treatment approach, a method of incorporating an ecologic measure of treatment assignment into an individual-level multivariable model, similar to the instrumental variable approach. Estimates based on the grouped-treatment approach were closer to the true value than those of standard individual-level multivariable analysis in every simulation. Furthermore, confidence intervals based on the grouped-treatment approach achieved approximately their nominal coverage, whereas those based on individual-level analyses did not. The grouped-treatment approach appears to be more reliable than standard individual-level analysis in situations where the grouped-treatment variable is unassociated with the outcome except via the actual treatment assignment and measured covariates.
confounding factors (epidemiology); ecology; instrumental variable; selection bias; simulation
Abbreviations: Abbreviation: OR, odds ratio.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. Schmoor, A. Caputo, and M. Schumacher Evidence from Nonrandomized Studies: A Case Study on the Estimation of Causal Effects Am. J. Epidemiol., May 1, 2008; 167(9): 1120 - 1129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Sturmer, S. Schneeweiss, M. A. Brookhart, K. J. Rothman, J. Avorn, and R. J. Glynn Analytic Strategies to Adjust Confounding using Exposure Propensity Scores and Disease Risk Scores: Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs and Short-term Mortality in the Elderly Am. J. Epidemiol., May 1, 2005; 161(9): 891 - 898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. C. Douglas, D. C. Tong, L. A. Gillum, S. Zhao, L. M. Brass, J. Dostal, and S. C. Johnston Do the Brain Attack Coalition's criteria for stroke centers improve care for ischemic stroke? Neurology, February 8, 2005; 64(3): 422 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. C. Hemphill III, J. Newman, S. Zhao, and S. C. Johnston Hospital Usage of Early Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders and Outcome After Intracerebral Hemorrhage Stroke, May 1, 2004; 35(5): 1130 - 1134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|