Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dwyer, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dwyer, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dwyer, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dwyer, J. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Am J Epidemiol 2002; 156:438-444.
Copyright © 2002 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Carotid Wall Thickness and Years Since Bilateral Oophorectomy

The Los Angeles Atherosclerosis Study

Kathleen M. Dwyer1, Cheryl K. Nordstrom1,2, C. Noel Bairey Merz3 and James H. Dwyer1

1 Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
2 Division of Cardiology, St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI.
3 Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.

Evidence that coronary heart disease risk increases with surgical menopause is consistent. However, findings concerning atherosclerosis and surgical menopause are inconsistent. The Los Angeles Atherosclerosis Study (1995–1996) assessed the cross-sectional relation at baseline between years since bilateral oophorectomy and common carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT). Participants included 269 employed California women asymptomatic for cardiovascular disease and aged 45–60 years. Ninety-seven women reported a hysterectomy: 42 without oophorectomy or a unilateral oophorectomy and 55 with a concurrent bilateral oophorectomy. IMT was measured bilaterally with B-mode ultrasound and was regressed on age, height, and years since hysterectomy in each group. Among women who had undergone bilateral oophorectomy, IMT was significantly related to years since hysterectomy (ß = 0.042 (standard error, 0.018) mm/10 years, p = 0.02). However, IMT was unrelated to years since hysterectomy in the no bilateral oophorectomy group (ß = 0.005 (standard error, 0.023) mm/10 years, p = 0.82). Adjustment for high density lipoprotein or low density lipoprotein cholesterol attenuated the association between IMT and years since hysterectomy by about a fourth in the bilateral oophorectomy group. Since over 90% of this group had a history of hormone replacement therapy use, the finding that years since bilateral oophorectomy was associated with increasing atherosclerosis conflicts with a well-known finding that such therapy reverses the adverse effect of bilateral oophorectomy on coronary heart disease.

atherosclerosis; cardiovascular diseases; carotid arteries; hysterectomy; ovariectomy

Abbreviations: Abbreviations: ARIC, Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities; HRT, hormone replacement therapy; IMT, intima-media thickness; SE, standard error.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. E. Rossouw, R. L. Prentice, J. E. Manson, L. Wu, D. Barad, V. M. Barnabei, M. Ko, A. Z. LaCroix, K. L. Margolis, and M. L. Stefanick
Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease by Age and Years Since Menopause
JAMA, April 4, 2007; 297(13): 1465 - 1477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.