American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 155, No. 6 : 572-576
Copyright © 2002 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health
PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY |
Comparison of Telephone and Postal Survey Modes on Respiratory Symptoms and Risk Factors
1 Department of Thoracic Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
2 Centre for Clinical Research, Haukeland University Hospital, and Section for Medical Statistics, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Little is known about the comparability of postal and telephone survey modes in epidemiology. A cross-sectional, population-based study (n = 25,000) of lung disease was performed in 19981999 in two regions of Norway. Initial surveying was done by postal questionnaire. A 1% random sample (n = 171) of previous postal responders were resurveyed by telephone or cellular contact. The response rate was 67% on the telephone/cellular interview. Fewer incomplete answers were given by telephone than by mail. A lower prevalence was found by telephone for morning cough and exposure to passive smoking at work or home. Reproducibility was high for asthma, hay fever, wheezing, and attacks of breathlessness. Moderate reproducibility was seen for symptoms of chronic bronchitis. Reproducibility was low for indoor and work environment, although it was high for early life factors. Concordance coefficients were high for all continuous measures such as height, body weight, and pack-years. The authors conclude that the comparability between the postal and the telephone survey modes was good. The telephone survey mode gave more complete information. Survey mode may have a moderate effect on study results, depending on the specific questions asked.
data collection; health surveys; interviews; postal service; telephone
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Ihlebaek, S. Brage, and H. R. Eriksen Health complaints and sickness absence in Norway, 1996-2003 Occup. Med., January 1, 2007; 57(1): 43 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M J Nieuwenhuijsen Design of exposure questionnaires for epidemiological studies Occup. Environ. Med., April 1, 2005; 62(4): 272 - 280. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Aitken, P. H. Youl, M. Janda, M. Elwood, I. T. Ring, and J. B. Lowe Comparability of Skin Screening Histories Obtained by Telephone Interviews and Mailed Questionnaires: A Randomized Crossover Study Am. J. Epidemiol., September 15, 2004; 160(6): 598 - 604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Delucchi Sample Size Estimation in Research With Dependent Measures and Dichotomous Outcomes Am J Public Health, March 1, 2004; 94(3): 372 - 377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Brogger, T. Eagan, G.E. Eide, P. Bakke, and A. Gulsvik Bias in retrospective studies of trends in asthma incidence Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2004; 23(2): 281 - 286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
The pharmacoepidemiology of COPD: Recent advances and methodological discussion Eur. Respir. J., September 1, 2003; 22(43_suppl): 1s - 44s. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Brogger, P. Bakke, G. E. Eide, and A. Gulsvik Contribution of Follow-up of Nonresponders to Prevalence and Risk Estimates: A Norwegian Respiratory Health Survey Am. J. Epidemiol., March 15, 2003; 157(6): 558 - 566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Brogger, P. Bakke, G.E. Eide, B. Johansen, A. Andersen, and A. Gulsvik Long-term changes in adult asthma prevalence Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2003; 21(3): 468 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




