Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, A.-M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, A.-M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 155, No. 1 : 95-100
Copyright © 2002 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

Do Interviewers' Health Beliefs and Habits Modify Responses to Sensitive Questions? A Study using Data Collected from Pregnant Women by Means of Computer-assisted Telephone Interviews

Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen1,2 and Jørn Olsen3

1 Department of Epidemiology Research, The Danish Epidemiology Science Centre, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.
2 Department of Social Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 3 Blegdamsvej, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
3 The Danish Epidemiology Science Centre, University of Aarhus, 6 Vennelyst Boulevard, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.

If interviewers' personal habits or attitudes influence respondents' answers to given questions, this may lead to bias, which should be taken into consideration when analyzing data. The authors examined a potential interviewer effect in a study of pregnant women in which exposure data were obtained through computer-assisted telephone interviews. The authors compared interviewer characteristics for 34 interviewers with the responses they obtained in 12,910 interviews carried out for the Danish National Birth Cohort Study. Response data on smoking and alcohol consumption in the first trimester of pregnancy were collected during the time period October 1, 1997–February 1, 1999. Overall, the authors found little evidence to suggest that interviewers' personal habits or attitudes toward smoking and alcohol consumption during pregnancy had consequences for the responses they obtained; neither did the interviewers' education, age, or parity correlate with the answers they obtained. In these data gathered through computer-assisted telephone interviews, interviewer effects arising from variations in interviewers' health beliefs and personal habits were found to be negligible. Thorough training of the interviewers and continuous supervision may have contributed to this finding.

data collection; effect modifiers (epidemiology); epidemiologic methods; interviews; pregnancy; telephone


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
C. S. Morgen, C. Bjork, P. K. Andersen, L. H. Mortensen, and A.-M. Nybo Andersen
Socioeconomic position and the risk of preterm birth--a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2008; 37(5): 1109 - 1120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
K. Albertsen, A.-M. N. Andersen, J. Olsen, and M. Gronbaek
Alcohol Consumption during Pregnancy and the Risk of Preterm Delivery
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 15, 2004; 159(2): 155 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
J L Zhu, N H Hjollund, H Boggild, and J Olsen
Shift work and subfecundity: a causal link or an artefact?
Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2003; 60(9): e12 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.