Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Falkner, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Trevisan, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Falkner, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Trevisan, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 154, No. 9 : 865-872
Copyright © 2001 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

Participant Characteristics and Quality of Recall of Physical Activity in the Distant Past

Karen L. Falkner1,2, Susan E. McCann1 and Maurizio Trevisan1

1 Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY.
2 Department of Cancer Prevention, Epidemiology, and Biostatistics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY.

Assessment of physical activity in the distant past, usually by recall, is necessary to evaluate its etiologic effects on chronic disease. Few studies have investigated influences on such long-term recall. The authors investigated the association of gender, age, education, marital status, current physical activity, body weight, body mass index, blood pressure, and pulse with the quality of recall of physical activity in a Buffalo Health Study cohort followed since the early 1960s. Comparisons of original, recalled, and current reports of physical activity were made in 137 survivors of the cohort. The quality of recall (the difference between original and recalled reports) values near zero indicated the best recall; positive values, overestimation; and negative values, underestimation. Overestimators had the highest levels, and good recallers lower levels, of current physical activity. Although the authors found differences by gender, age, and education, the evidence did not support better recall by one group compared with the others. Moreover, no association of marital status, body weight, body mass index, blood pressure, or pulse was found with the quality of recall. The results suggest that individual respondent characteristics have little association with recall of past physical activity; however, current physical activity may be a factor to consider in studies of past physical activity and chronic disease.

epidemiologic methods; exercise; recall


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJPHHome page
S. L. Gomez, J. L. Kelsey, S. L. Glaser, M. M. Lee, and S. Sidney
Immigration and Acculturation in Relation to Health and Health-Related Risk Factors Among Specific Asian Subgroups in a Health Maintenance Organization
Am J Public Health, November 1, 2004; 94(11): 1977 - 1984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. Lissner, N. Potischman, R. Troiano, and C. Bengtsson
Recall of Physical Activity in the Distant Past: The 32-Year Follow-up of the Prospective Population Study of Women in Goteborg, Sweden
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2004; 159(3): 304 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
K. R. Evenson, S. Wilcox, M. Pettinger, R. Brunner, A. C. King, and A. McTiernan
Vigorous Leisure Activity through Women's Adult Life: The Women's Health Initiative Observational Cohort Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 15, 2002; 156(10): 945 - 953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.