Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olson, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olson, S. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 154, No. 6 : 574-581
Copyright © 2001 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

Reported Participation in Case-Control Studies: Changes over Time

Sara H. Olson

From Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Box 44, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021 (e-mail: olsons{at}mskcc.org).

There is concern that participation in case-control studies has declined. To address this question, the author and colleagues reviewed data from 82 US and Canadian case-control studies published in epidemiologic journals during two periods: 1988–1990 and 1997–January 1999. The median year of data collection, which ranged from 1972 to 1996, was the primary independent variable. Reported response among both cases and controls remained constant over this time period. The regression coefficients (ß) were small: For each year, there was a change of 0.15 percentage points for cases (p = 0.56) and –0.16 percentage points for controls (p = 0.54). Possible confounders included the location where the study had been conducted and, for cases, the disease under study (cancer vs. others). After adjustment for these factors in case groups, there was still no association between year of data collection and response: For each year, there was a change of –0.20 percentage points (p = 0.43). After adjustment of results for study location among controls, there was a moderate decline over time: For each year, there was a change of –0.44 percentage points (p = 0.12). Overall, reported response in more recent studies was similar to that in earlier studies; for control groups, this may reflect changes in locations where the studies were conducted.

case-control studies; data collection; epidemiologic methods

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
TOMBOLA Group
Cytological surveillance compared with immediate referral for colposcopy in management of women with low grade cervical abnormalities: multicentre randomised controlled trial
BMJ, July 28, 2009; 339(jul28_2): b2546 - b2546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
T. J. Beebe, S. M. Jenkins, K. J. Anderson, and M. E. Davern
Survey-Related Experiential and Attitudinal Correlates of Future Health Survey Participation: Results of a Statewide Survey
Mayo Clin. Proc., December 1, 2008; 83(12): 1358 - 1363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. P. Vandenbroucke, E. v. Elm, D. G. Altman, P. C. Gotzsche, C. D. Mulrow, S. J. Pocock, C. Poole, J. J. Schlesselman, M. Egger, and for the STROBE initiative
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration
Ann Intern Med, October 16, 2007; 147(8): W-163 - W-194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
D. Yoshida, S. Kono, M. A Moore, K. Toyomura, J. Nagano, T. Mizoue, R. Mibu, M. Tanaka, Y. Kakeji, Y. Maehara, et al.
Colorectal Polypectomy and Risk of Colorectal Cancer by Subsite: The Fukuoka Colorectal Cancer Study
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., August 23, 2007; (2007) hym065v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
G. R. Bunin, L. G. Spector, A. F. Olshan, L. L. Robison, M. Roesler, S. Grufferman, X.-o. Shu, and J. A. Ross
Secular Trends in Response Rates for Controls Selected by Random Digit Dialing in Childhood Cancer Studies: A Report from the Children's Oncology Group
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 1, 2007; 166(1): 109 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. M. Morton, J. Cahill, and P. Hartge
Reporting Participation in Epidemiologic Studies: A Survey of Practice
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2006; 163(3): 197 - 203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. Macarthur, L. Sharp, G. L. Hold, J. Little, and E. M. El-Omar
The Role of Cytokine Gene Polymorphisms in Colorectal Cancer and Their Interaction with Aspirin Use in the Northeast of Scotland
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2005; 14(7): 1613 - 1618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
A. Rogers, M. A. Murtaugh, S. Edwards, and M. L. Slattery
Contacting Controls: Are We Working Harder for Similar Response Rates, and Does It Make a Difference?
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 1, 2004; 160(1): 85 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. A. Ross, L. G. Spector, A. F. Olshan, and G. R. Bunin
Invited Commentary: Birth Certificates--A Best Control Scenario?
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 15, 2004; 159(10): 922 - 924.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.