American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 154, No. 5 : 391-398
Copyright © 2001 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health
COMMENTARY |
Using Validation Sets for Outcomes and Exposure to Infection in Vaccine Field Studies
From the Department of Biostatistics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322.
Methods of adjusting for bias in estimates due to mismeasured or missing covariates and outcomes through the use of validation sets have been developed in many types of health studies. These methods can be employed for the efficient design and analysis of vaccine studies as well. On the one hand, nonspecific case definitions can lead to attenuated efficacy and effectiveness estimates, but confirmation by culture or a quick test of the infectious agent is also expensive and difficult. On the other hand, data on exposure to infection can influence estimates of vaccine efficacy, but good data on exposure are difficult to obtain. In this paper, the authors show how use of small validation sets can correct the bias of the estimates obtained from a large main study while maintaining efficiency. They illustrate the approach for outcomes using the example of influenza vaccine efficacy and effectiveness trials and illustrate the approach for exposure to infection using the example of a human immunodeficiency virus vaccine trial. The authors discuss challenges posed by infectious diseases in the use of currently available methods. Development of these efficient designs and methods of analysis for vaccine field studies will improve estimation of vaccine efficacy for both susceptibility and infectiousness, as well as estimation of indirect and overall effects of vaccination in community trials.
bias (epidemiology); epidemiologic methods; HIV; influenza; vaccines; validation sets
Abbreviations: IP, incidence proportion; VE, vaccine efficacy
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. Simonsen Commentary: Observational studies and the art of accurately measuring influenza vaccine benefits Int. J. Epidemiol., June 22, 2007; (2007) dym084v1. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. O. Scharfstein, M. E. Halloran, H. Chu, and M. J. Daniels On estimation of vaccine efficacy using validation samples with selection bias Biostat., October 1, 2006; 7(4): 615 - 629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. G Hudgens, P. B Gilbert, and S. G Self Endpoints in vaccine trials Statistical Methods in Medical Research, April 1, 2004; 13(2): 89 - 114. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Warner, D. R. Newman, H. D. Austin, M. L. Kamb, J. M. Douglas Jr., C. K. Malotte, J. M. Zenilman, J. Rogers, G. Bolan, M. Fishbein, et al. Condom Effectiveness for Reducing Transmission of Gonorrhea and Chlamydia: The Importance of Assessing Partner Infection Status Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2004; 159(3): 242 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. E. Halloran, I. M. Longini Jr., M. J. Gaglani, P. A. Piedra, H. Chu, G. B. Herschler, and W. P. Glezen Estimating Efficacy of Trivalent, Cold-adapted, Influenza Virus Vaccine (CAIV-T) against Influenza A (H1N1) and B Using Surveillance Cultures Am. J. Epidemiol., August 15, 2003; 158(4): 305 - 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. S. Monto Invited Commentary: Use of Selective Viral Cultures to Adjust Nonvirologic Endpoints in Studies of Influenza Vaccine Efficacy Am. J. Epidemiol., August 15, 2003; 158(4): 312 - 315. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|