Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perz, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Schaffner, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Perz, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Schaffner, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 154, No. 11 : 1000-1005
Copyright © 2001 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Evaluation of Innovative Surveillance for Drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

Joseph F. Perz1,2, Allen S. Craig2,3, Daniel M. Jorgensen4, Stephanie Hall4 and William Schaffner2,3

1 Epidemic Intelligence Service, Division of Applied Public Health Training, Epidemiology Program Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
2 Communicable and Environmental Disease Services, Tennessee Department of Health, Nashville, TN.
3 Department of Preventive Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
4 Knox County Health Department, Knoxville, TN.

To monitor disease incidence and antibiotic resistance, effective, practical surveillance strategies are needed at the local level for drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (DRSP). Knox County, Tennessee, participates in three forms of DRSP surveillance: an active system sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC; Atlanta, Georgia); a novel county-sponsored system; and conventional state-mandated reporting. Ascertainment of invasive S. pneumoniae infection cases by each system in 1998 was evaluated, and completeness of reporting, antibiotic resistance patterns, costs, and other attributes were compared. The county-sponsored system collects patient identifiers and drug susceptibility data directly from hospital laboratories, whereas the CDC-sponsored system performs medical chart abstractions and reference laboratory susceptibility testing. Similar numbers of invasive S. pneumoniae cases were detected by the county-sponsored (n = 127) and CDC-sponsored (n = 123) systems; these systems held >75% of all cases in common, and each system achieved >85% sensitivity. Conventional reporting contained 88% and 76% of the DRSP cases identified by the county- and CDC-sponsored systems, respectively, but did not capture infections produced by susceptible isolates. Both the county- and CDC-sponsored systems indicated that large proportions of isolates were resistant to penicillin and extended-spectrum cephalosporins. The county-sponsored DRSP surveillance system was inexpensive, simple to execute, and relevant to local needs.

community-acquired infections; drug resistance, microbial; epidemiologic methods; laboratories, hospital; microbial sensitivity tests; pneumococcal infections; population surveillance; Streptococcus pneumoniae

Abbreviations: ABCs, Active Bacterial Core surveillance; CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; DRSP, drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. F. Perz, A. S. Craig, C. S. Coffey, D. M. Jorgensen, E. Mitchel, S. Hall, W. Schaffner, and M. R. Griffin
Changes in Antibiotic Prescribing for Children After a Community-wide Campaign
JAMA, June 19, 2002; 287(23): 3103 - 3109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.