American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 153, No. 3 : 265-274
Copyright © 2001 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS |
Counter-Matching in Studies of Gene-Environment Interaction: Efficiency and Feasibility
1 Unité de Recherche en Epidémiologie des Cancers, Institut de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U521, Institut Gustave-Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France.
2 Genetic Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
3 Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
The interest in studying gene-environment interaction is increasing for complex diseases. However, most methods of detecting gene-environment interactions may not be appropriate for the study of interactions involving rare genes (G) or uncommon environmental exposures (E), because of poor statistical power. To increase this power, the authors propose the counter-matching design. This design increases the number of subjects with the rare factor without increasing the number of measurements that must be performed. In this paper, the efficiency and feasibility (required sample sizes) of counter-matching designs are evaluated and discussed. Counter-matching on both G and E appears to be the most efficient design for detecting gene-environment interaction. The sensitivity and specificity of the surrogate measures, the frequencies of G and E, and, to a lesser extent, the value of the interaction effect are the most important parameters for determining efficiency. Feasibility is also more dependent on the exposure frequencies and the interaction effect than on the main effects of G and E. Although the efficiency of counter-matching is greatest when the risk factors are very rare, the study of such rare factors is not realistic unless one is interested in very strong interaction effects. Nevertheless, counter-matching appears to be more appropriate than most traditional epidemiologic methods for the study of interactions involving rare factors.
case-control studies; cohort studies; epidemiologic methods; interaction; matched-pair analysis; research design; statistics
Abbreviations: ARE, asymptotic relative efficiency; RR, rate ratio.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Lorenzo Bermejo and K. Hemminki Gene-environment studies: any advantage over environmental studies? Carcinogenesis, July 1, 2007; 28(7): 1526 - 1532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. T. Zondervan, L. R. Cardon, and S. H. Kennedy What makes a good case-control study?: Design issues for complex traits such as endometriosis Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 1415 - 1423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Sturmer and H. Brenner Flexible Matching Strategies to Increase Power and Efficiency to Detect and Estimate Gene-Environment Interactions in Case-Control Studies Am. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2002; 155(7): 593 - 602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. A. Hobbs, M. A. Cleves, and C. J. Simmons Genetic Epidemiology and Congenital Malformations: From the Chromosome to the Crib Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, April 1, 2002; 156(4): 315 - 320. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. J. Gauderman Sample Size Requirements for Association Studies of Gene-Gene Interaction Am. J. Epidemiol., March 1, 2002; 155(5): 478 - 484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|