American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 153, No. 2 : 184-187
Copyright © 2001 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS |
Observed versus Indirect Estimates of Incidence of Open-Angle Glaucoma
From the Department of Preventive Medicine, University Medical Center at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY.
Incidence data on open-angle glaucoma (OAG) are limited and difficult to obtain. To date, few studies have reported incidence directly measured from population-based cohorts. Other reported estimates have been derived indirectly from age-specific prevalence by using several assumptions, and their validity is unknown. To the authors' knowledge, this report presents the first comparison of observed versus indirect estimates of OAG incidence based on data from the population-based Barbados Incidence Study of Eye Diseases (19921997) (n = 3,427; 85% participation). The observed 4-year incidence of OAG was 1.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.6, 2.1%) at ages 4049 years, 1.5% (95% CI: 0.8, 2.5%) at ages 5059 years, 3.2% (95% CI: 2.0, 4.8%) at ages 6069 years, and 4.2% (95% CI: 2.6, 6.3%) in persons at ages 70 or more years. When incidence was calculated from the prevalence data, power function fitting achieved a closer approximation to observed incidence than did logistic curve fitting. Calculated incidence rates for each group were similar when assuming mortality that was equal (incidence rate = 0.7, 1.3, 2.3, and 4.8%) or differential (incidence rate = 0.7, 1.2, 2.4, and 4.8%). Other nonlogistic approaches also increased the resemblance of observed and calculated estimates. In the absence of longitudinal data, reasonably valid incidence estimates of OAG were obtained from available prevalence data. These estimation techniques can be useful when OAG incidence estimates are required for research or public health purposes.
glaucoma; incidence; prevalence
Abbreviations: BES, Barbados Eye Study; OAG, open-angle glaucoma
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Ryskulova, K. Turczyn, D. M. Makuc, M. F. Cotch, R. J. Klein, and R. Janiszewski Self-Reported Age-Related Eye Diseases and Visual Impairment in the United States: Results of the 2002 National Health Interview Survey Am J Public Health, March 1, 2008; 98(3): 454 - 461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-Y. Wu, B. Nemesure, A. Hennis, A. P. Schachat, L. Hyman, M. C. Leske, and for the Barbados Eye Studies Group Open-angle Glaucoma and Mortality: The Barbados Eye Studies Arch Ophthalmol, March 1, 2008; 126(3): 365 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T. Broman, H. A. Quigley, S. K. West, J. Katz, B. Munoz, K. Bandeen-Roche, J. M. Tielsch, D. S. Friedman, J. Crowston, H. R. Taylor, et al. Estimating the Rate of Progressive Visual Field Damage in Those with Open-Angle Glaucoma, from Cross-Sectional Data Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 66 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. A. Sloan, D. S. Brown, E. S. Carlisle, J. Ostermann, and P. P. Lee Estimates of Incidence Rates With Longitudinal Claims Data Arch Ophthalmol, October 1, 2003; 121(10): 1462 - 1468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


