Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilpin, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pierce, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gilpin, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pierce, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 152, Issue 8 727-738, Copyright © 2000 by Oxford University Press


Index for US state tobacco control initial outcomes [In Process Citation]

EA Gilpin, FA Stillman, AM Hartman, JT Gibson and JP Pierce
Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of California, San Diego, Cancer Center, La Jolla 92037-0645, USA.

Public health tobacco control efforts have increasingly targeted communities in addition to individuals. Before population smoking decreases, effectiveness might be detected from initial outcomes reflecting these efforts, such as higher cigarette prices or more workplace and home smoking restrictions. Presumably, these initial outcomes will eventually influence smoking behavior. State-specific estimates of percentages of the population working or living under smoking bans are available from the 1992-1993 tobacco use supplement to the Current Population Survey, conducted annually by the US Bureau of the Census. In addition, the tobacco industry reports the average state cigarette price yearly. The authors constructed a tobacco control initial outcomes index (IOI) by using values of these variables for each state and correlated it with state-specific adult (aged > or =25 years) and youth (aged 15-24 years) smoking prevalence computed from the Current Population Survey and per capita cigarette consumption data computed from sales and Census Bureau data. Both adult smoking prevalence (r = -0.70) and per capita consumption (r = -0.73) were significantly correlated with the IOI; youth smoking prevalence correlated less well (r = -0.34). Although the analysis is not definitive, deseasonalized 1983-1997 consumption trends for IOI-based tertile groups were divergent beginning in 1993, with the high IOI group showing the greatest decrease. A high relative IOI index may be predictive of future smoking decreases and should be considered when tobacco control efforts are evaluated.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
A P Polednak
Tobacco control indicators and lung cancer rates in young adults by state in the United States
Tob. Control, January 1, 2008; 17(1): 66 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
K. Messer, J. P Pierce, S.-H. Zhu, A. M Hartman, W. K Al-Delaimy, D. R Trinidad, and E. A Gilpin
The California Tobacco Control Program's effect on adult smokers: (1) Smoking cessation
Tob. Control, April 1, 2007; 16(2): 85 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
L Joossens and M Raw
The Tobacco Control Scale: a new scale to measure country activity
Tob. Control, June 1, 2006; 15(3): 247 - 253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
G. Thomson, N. Wilson, and P. Howden-Chapman
Population level policy options for increasing the prevalence of smokefree homes.
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, April 1, 2006; 60(4): 298 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. E. Tyczynski and H. J. Berkel
Mortality From Lung Cancer and Tobacco Smoking in Ohio (U.S.): Will Increasing Smoking Prevalence Reverse Current Decreases in Mortality?
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2005; 14(5): 1182 - 1187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
J. Austin-Lane, D. C. Girasek, and G. L. Barbour
A Qualitative Study of Post-Settlement Influences on State Tobacco Control Funding
Health Promot Pract, July 1, 2004; 5(3_suppl): 46S - 56S.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
F. A. Stillman, A. M. Hartman, B. I. Graubard, E. A. Gilpin, D. M. Murray, and J. T. Gibson
Evaluation of the American Stop Smoking Intervention Study (ASSIST): A Report of Outcomes
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 19, 2003; 95(22): 1681 - 1691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
M. A. Schuster, T. Franke, and C. B. Pham
Smoking Patterns of Household Members and Visitors in Homes With Children in the United States
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, November 1, 2002; 156(11): 1094 - 1100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
Evaluating comprehensive tobacco control interventions: challenges and recommendations for future action
Tob. Control, June 1, 2002; 11(2): 140 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
E. A. Gilpin, A. J. Farkas, S. L. Emery, C. F. Ake, and J. P. Pierce
Clean Indoor Air: Advances in California, 1990-1999
Am J Public Health, May 1, 2002; 92(5): 785 - 791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
C P Morley, K M Cummings, A Hyland, G A Giovino, and J K Horan
Tobacco Institute lobbying at the state and local levels of government in the 1990s
Tob. Control, March 1, 2002; 11(90001): i102 - 109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
F. A Stillman, K. A Cronin, W D. Evans, and A. Ulasevich
Can media advocacy influence newspaper coverage of tobacco: measuring the effectiveness of the American stop smoking intervention study's (ASSIST) media advocacy strategies
Tob. Control, June 1, 2001; 10(2): 137 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.