Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Umbach, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Umbach, D. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 152, No. 8 : 701-703
Copyright © 2000 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Invited Commentary: On Studying the Joint Effects of Candidate Genes and Exposures

David M. Umbach

From the Biostatistics Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC.


    INTRODUCTION
 
For a long time, epidemiologists have recognized that human disease arises from the interplay of environmental exposures and host susceptibilities. With recent advances in molecular biology, assessment of genetic contributions to susceptibility has progressed from indirect measures based on family history to direct measures of an individual's genotype at particular loci. With a draft sequence for the entire human genome in hand, medical science is poised for rapid advances in the study of how genetic susceptibility modulates risk from environmental exposures.

The goal of gene-environment studies in epidemiology is to learn how the risk of a disease changes as a joint function of genotype and exposure. Such studies promise new insights into etiology. They also promise the eventual capability to tailor interventions more precisely, whether at a clinical level, where the therapeutic agent prescribed or its dose may be chosen in light of an individual's genetic makeup, or at a . . . [Full Text of this Article]


    CONFOUNDING
 

    BIOLOGIC PLAUSIBILITY
 

    A FINAL REMARK
 

    NOTES
 

    REFERENCES
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. Sharp, Z. Miedzybrodzka, A. H. Cardy, J. Inglis, L. Madrigal, S. Barker, D. Chesney, C. Clark, and N. Maffulli
The C677T Polymorphism in the Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase Gene (MTHFR), Maternal Use of Folic Acid Supplements, and Risk of Isolated Clubfoot: A Case-Parent-Triad Analysis
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 1, 2006; 164(9): 852 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
A J Sandford and E K Silverman
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease * 1: Susceptibility factors for COPD the genotype-environment interaction
Thorax, August 1, 2002; 57(8): 736 - 741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
X. Wang, B. Zuckerman, C. Pearson, G. Kaufman, C. Chen, G. Wang, T. Niu, P. H. Wise, H. Bauchner, and X. Xu
Maternal Cigarette Smoking, Metabolic Gene Polymorphism, and Infant Birth Weight
JAMA, January 9, 2002; 287(2): 195 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]