American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 152, No. 7 : 688-689
Copyright © 2000 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR |
RE: "PROBLEMS DUE TO SMALL SAMPLES AND SPARSE DATA IN CONDITIONAL LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS"
Swiss Federal Office of Public Health Division of Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases 3003 Berne, Switzerland
Greenland et al. (1
) offer a critical discussion of problems arising in the conditional logistic regression model when information in the data is weak relative to background knowledge. They warn against an uncritical use of this model and recommend that "analysts need to inspect their data in detail in order to alert themselves to the possible danger [of statistical bias]..." (1, p. 537). We fully agree on this point but would like to add two remarks to their investigation.
Statistical inference, the methodology used most widely to tackle inference problems in the empirical sciences, is hampered by two major difficulties:
- To
. . . [Full Text of this Article]
Department of Epidemiology UCLA School of Public Health Department of Statistics UCLA College of Letters and Science Los Angeles, CA 900951772
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. E. Neuenschwander, M. Zwahlen, and S. Greenland RE: "PROBLEMS DUE TO SMALL SAMPLES AND SPARSE DATA IN CONDITIONAL LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS" Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2000; 152(7): 688 - 689. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
