Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olson, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Harlap, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olson, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Harlap, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 152, Issue 6 585-592, Copyright © 2000 by Oxford University Press

ARTICLES

Selection of control groups by using a commercial database and random digit dialing

SH Olson, L Mignone and S Harlap
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA. olsons@mskcc.org

Identifying a control group when cases come from a specialized hospital is a challenge for epidemiologists. The authors compared controls recruited by using a commercial database with those recruited by random digit dialing in the context of a hospital-based case-control study of ovarian cancer. This part of the study was conducted in 1997-1998 among women aged 18 years or older who resided in the New York metropolitan area. A mailing list owner grouped cases into "lifestyle" clusters based on US zip+4 postal code microneighborhoods and generated a random sample of potential controls with the same distribution across the clusters. Controls recruited from the commercial database (n = 82) and from random digit dialing (n = 90) were similar in age and race. Women from the commercial database had somewhat more education and higher incomes and were more similar to the cases on these measures. The control groups resembled each other closely in terms of oral contraceptive use, nulliparity, and religion and differed from the cases on these measures. Response rates were similar for the two groups. Only 28% of the cases were included on the mailing list, indicating that it did not reflect the source population of the cases. Use of a commercial database provided a control group whose socioeconomic factors were similar to those of cases at a lower cost than when random digit dialing was used but did not result in a higher response rate.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. Clague, J. Lin, A. Cassidy, S. Matin, N. M. Tannir, P. Tamboli, C. G. Wood, and X. Wu
Family History and Risk of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results from a Case-Control Study and Systematic Meta-Analysis
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2009; 18(3): 801 - 807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.