Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, T. K.
Right arrow Articles by Grandjean, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, T. K.
Right arrow Articles by Grandjean, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 152, Issue 6 565-572, Copyright © 2000 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Selection bias in determining the age dependence of waiting time to pregnancy

TK Jensen, T Scheike, N Keiding, I Schaumburg and P Grandjean
Department of Environmental Medicine, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense. t.koldjensen@ic.ac.uk

Many studies have found decreased fecundability, that is, the ability to conceive in a menstrual cycle, with increasing female age. To evaluate the effect of maternal age on waiting time to pregnancy, the authors reviewed hospital charts of all pregnant women attending prophylactic antenatal care at Odense University Hospital, Denmark, during 1972-1987. Only the first pregnancy of each woman and only planned pregnancies were included (n = 14,754). The fecundability odds ratio (FR) was calculated as the odds of a conception in a menstrual cycle among the older women divided by the odds among women aged 15-24 years. The FR for women aged 25-29 years was 1.12 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04, 1.20), for women aged 30-34 years it was 1.15 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.30), and for women above 34 years the FR was 2.44 (95% CI: 1.84, 3.22) after adjustment for confounders. The increased fecundability with age is contrary to previous studies and may be explained by selection bias, as sterile women were not included. In addition, some very fertile young women who became pregnant by accident before efficient birth control methods were available and therefore were excluded from time to pregnancy studies may now use oral contraceptives until they plan a pregnancy later in life and are included.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Joffe, J. Key, N. Best, T.K. Jensen, and N. Keiding
The role of biological fertility in predicting family size
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2009; 24(8): 1999 - 2006.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med SciHome page
C. H. Morrell, L. J. Brant, and L. Ferrucci
Model Choice Can Obscure Results in Longitudinal Studies
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, February 5, 2009; (2009) gln024v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. Key, N. Best, M. Joffe, T. K. Jensen, and N. Keiding
Methodological Issues in Analyzing Time Trends in Biologic Fertility: Protection Bias
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2009; 169(3): 285 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
M Sallmen, M Neto, and O N Mayan
Reduced fertility among shoe manufacturing workers
Occup. Environ. Med., August 1, 2008; 65(8): 518 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
R Slama, O Boutou, B Ducot, and A Spira
Reproductive life events in the population living in the vicinity of a nuclear waste reprocessing plant
J Epidemiol Community Health, June 1, 2008; 62(6): 513 - 521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
M. Joffe, J. Bennett, N. Best, and T. K. Jensen
Sex ratio and time to pregnancy: analysis of four large European population surveys
BMJ, March 10, 2007; 334(7592): 524 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Axmon, L. Rylander, M. Albin, and L. Hagmar
Factors affecting time to pregnancy
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1279 - 1284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
T. H Scheike and N. Keiding
Design and analysis of time-to-pregnancy
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, April 1, 2006; 15(2): 127 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. Joffe, J. Key, N. Best, N. Keiding, T. Scheike, and T. K. Jensen
Studying Time to Pregnancy by Use of a Retrospective Design
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 15, 2005; 162(2): 115 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Gnoth, E. Godehardt, P. Frank-Herrmann, K. Friol, J. Tigges, and G. Freundl
Definition and prevalence of subfertility and infertility
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 20(5): 1144 - 1147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.A.M. Hassan and S.R. Killick
Is previous aberrant reproductive outcome predictive of subsequently reduced fecundity?
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 657 - 664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.A.M. Hassan and S.R. Killick
Is previous use of hormonal contraception associated with a detrimental effect on subsequent fecundity?
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2004; 19(2): 344 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Gnoth, D. Godehardt, E. Godehardt, P. Frank-Herrmann, and G. Freundl
Time to pregnancy: results of the German prospective study and impact on the management of infertility
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1959 - 1966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Sallmen and R. Luukkonen
Is the observed association between increasing paternal age and delayed conception an artefact?
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2001; 16(9): 2027 - 2028.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.