Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ulm, K.
Right arrow Articles by Küchenhoff, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ulm, K.
Right arrow Articles by Küchenhoff, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 152, No. 3 : 289
Copyright © 2000 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

RE: "USE OF TWO-SEGMENTED LOGISTIC REGRESSION TO ESTIMATE CHANGE-POINTS IN EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES"

Kurt Ulm and Helmut Küchenhoff

Institut für Medizinische Statistik und Epidemiologie Technische Universität München München, Germany
Statistisches Beratungslabor Universität München München, Germany


   INTRODUCTION
 
Pastor and Guallar (1Go) have described an interesting problem in epidemiology, the use of two-segmented logistic regression. In the introduction to their paper, they stated that none of the usual . . . [Full Text of this Article]


   NOTES
 

   REFERENCES
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
R. Pastor and E. Guallar
RE: "USE OF TWO-SEGMENTED LOGISTIC REGRESSION TO ESTIMATE CHANGE-POINTS IN EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES"
Am. J. Epidemiol., March 15, 2001; 153(6): 615 - 615.
[Full Text] [PDF]