Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Osei-Hyiaman, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kano, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Osei-Hyiaman, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kano, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 148, No. 11: 1055-1061
Copyright © 1998 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


other

Timing of Menopause, Reproductive Years, and Bone Mineral Density

A Cross-Sectional Study of Postmenopausal Japanese Women

Douglas Osei-Hyiaman1, Toyokawa Satoshi1, Masaru Ueji2, Takahashi Hideto3 and Katsumi Kano3

1Graduate School of Medical Sciences, University of Tsukuba Tsukuba, Japan
2Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tsukuba Tsukuba, Japan
3Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tsukuba Tsukuba, Japan

Age at menopause has been found to be associated positively with bone mineral density, and age at menarche has been found to be associated negatively with bone mineral density. However, there have been few studies on the relations of timing of menopause and length of the reproductive period with bone mineral density. The purpose of this study was to examine the relations of timing of menopause and reproductive years (calculated as age at menopause minus age at menarche) with mineral density of the second metacarpal bone in postmenopausal Japanese women. The study population consisted of 1, 035 naturally menopausal women aged 40–70 years who were screened in 1996–1997. Using computed x-ray densitometry, the authors measured bone mineral density by analyzing radiographic films of the right second metacarpal bone. Using the women with early menopause (age <49 years) as the reference group and adjusting for age, subjects with late menopause were at decreased risk for low bone mineral density (odds ratio (OR) = 0.69, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 0.49–0.97). After adjustment for additional covariates (grip strength, physical activity, body mass index, smoking, and calcium intake), the association was unchanged (OR = 0.70, 95% Cl 0.50–0.99). Postmenopausal women with more reproductive years (>40 years) were at decreased risk for low bone mineral density compared with those with fewer reproductive years, after adjustment for age (OR = 0.73, 95% Cl 0.40–1.30) and potentially confounding factors (OR = 0.76, 95% Cl 0.41–1.37); thep-value for trend was not statistically significant. In multiple linear regression analysis, early menopause and fewer reproductive years were independent predictors of low bone mineral density. In this study, postmenopausal Japanese women who had a late menopause and more reproductive years were at decreased risk for low bone mineral density, and may therefore be less prone to osteoporosis. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 148: 1055-61.

bone density; menopause; osteoporosis; women


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. Teas, T. G. Hurley, J. R. Hebert, A. A. Franke, D. W. Sepkovic, and M. S. Kurzer
Dietary Seaweed Modifies Estrogen and Phytoestrogen Metabolism in Healthy Postmenopausal Women
J. Nutr., May 1, 2009; 139(5): 939 - 944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
W. Y. Chen and J. E. Manson
Premature Ovarian Failure in Cancer Survivors: New Insights, Looming Concerns.
J Natl Cancer Inst, July 5, 2006; 98(13): 880 - 881.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
H. S. Kok, K. M. van Asselt, Y. T. van der Schouw, P. H.M. Peeters, and C. Wijmenga
Genetic studies to identify genes underlying menopausal age
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2005; 11(5): 483 - 493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
B. K. Jacobsen, I. Heuch, and G. Kvale
Age at Natural Menopause and All-Cause Mortality: A 37-Year Follow-up of 19,731 Norwegian Women
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 15, 2003; 157(10): 923 - 929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. L. Crawford, C. B. Johannes, and R. K. Stellato
Assessment of Digit Preference in Self-reported Year at Menopause: Choice of an Appropriate Reference Distribution
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2002; 156(7): 676 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
J. S. Dorman, A. R. Steenkiste, T. P. Foley, E. S. Strotmeyer, J. P. Burke, L. H. Kuller, and C. K. Kwoh
Menopause in Type 1 Diabetic Women: Is it Premature?
Diabetes, August 1, 2001; 50(8): 1857 - 1862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
C. S. Berkey, J. D. Gardner, A. Lindsay Frazier, and G. A. Colditz
Relation of Childhood Diet and Body Size to Menarche and Adolescent Growth in Girls
Am. J. Epidemiol., September 1, 2000; 152(5): 446 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.