Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steenland, K.
Right arrow Articles by Maurer, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steenland, K.
Right arrow Articles by Maurer, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 147, No. 10: 932-939
Copyright © 1998 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


other

Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Risk Factors for Heart Disease among Never Smokers in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Kyle Steenland1,, Karl Sieber1, Ruth A. Etzel2, Terry Pechacek3 and Kurt Maurer4

1 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Cincinnati, OH
2 National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, GA
3 Office of Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, GA
4 National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Hyattsville, MD

Reprint requests to Dr. Kyle Steenland, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centyers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998.

The relative risk of coronary artery disease among never smokers exposed to environmental tobacco smoke (EPS) versus never smokers not exposed to ETS is approximately 1.2 based on more than a dozen epidemi-ologic studies. Most of these studies have controlled for the major heart disease risk factors, but residual or uncontrolled confounding remains a possible explanation for the epidemiologic findings. The authors studied 3, 338 never-smoking adults aged 17 years or older, who are representative of all US never smokers, in the 1988–1991 Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) to determine whether selected risk factors for heart disease differ between ETS-exposed and -nonexposed persons. Both self-reported ETS exposure (at home and at work) and serum cotinine levels were available, the latter reflecting recent ETS exposure. After adjustments were made for age, sex, race, and education among adults aged 17 years or older, no significant differences were found between the ETS exposed and the nonexposed for any of 13 cardiovascular risk factors with the exception of dietary carotene, which was lower among the exposed. On the other hand, significant positive linear trends were found between serum cotinine and two risk factors (body mass index and alcohol consumption), and significant inverse trends were found with dietary carotene. There were also few differences between exposed and nonexposed never smokers among adults aged 40 years or older, who are most at risk of heart disease. In this group, however, there was an inverse linear trend between serum cotinine and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (p < 0.001). This finding could result from ETS exposure rather than be an indication of confounding; a similar inverse trend was found for children, confirming other results in the literature. Overall, these data suggest little potential for confounding by the heart disease risk factors studied here when ETS exposure is determined by self-report. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 147: 932–39.

cardiovascular diseases; cotinine; environmental pollution; tobacco smoke; heart diseases; lipoproteins; HDL cholesterol; risk factors


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
Y. He, T. H. Lam, B. Jiang, J. Wang, X. Sai, L. Fan, X. Li, Y. Qin, and F. B. Hu
Combined effects of tobacco smoke exposure and metabolic syndrome on cardiovascular risk in older residents of china.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 27, 2009; 53(4): 363 - 371.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. E. Hill, T. Blakely, I. Kawachi, and A. Woodward
Mortality among Lifelong Nonsmokers Exposed to Secondhand Smoke at Home: Cohort Data and Sensitivity Analyses
Am. J. Epidemiol., March 1, 2007; 165(5): 530 - 540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
P. G Coen, J. Tully, J. M Stuart, D. Ashby, R. M Viner, and R. Booy
Is it exposure to cigarette smoke or to smokers which increases the risk of meningococcal disease in teenagers?
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2006; 35(2): 330 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Weitzman, S. Cook, P. Auinger, T. A. Florin, S. Daniels, M. Nguyen, and J. P. Winickoff
Tobacco Smoke Exposure Is Associated With the Metabolic Syndrome in Adolescents
Circulation, August 9, 2005; 112(6): 862 - 869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. Farchi, F. Forastiere, R. Pistelli, S. Baldacci, M. Simoni, C. A. Perucci, and G. Viegi
Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke Is Associated with Lower Plasma {beta}-Carotene Levels among Nonsmoking Women Married to a Smoker
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2001; 10(8): 907 - 909.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. J Alberg, J. C Chen, H. Zhao, S. C Hoffman, G. W Comstock, and K. J Helzlsouer
Household exposure to passive cigarette smoking and serum micronutrient concentrations
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2000; 72(6): 1576 - 1582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. R. Smith
Inaugural Article: National burden of disease in India from indoor air pollution
PNAS, November 21, 2000; 97(24): 13286 - 13293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.