Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (36)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goodman-Gruen, D.
Right arrow Articles by Barrett-Connor, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goodman-Gruen, D.
Right arrow Articles by Barrett-Connor, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 143, No. 9: 898-906
Copyright © 1996 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

Sex Differences in Measures of Body Fat and Body Fat Distribution in the Elderly

Deborah Goodman-Gruen and Elizabeth Barrett-Connor

Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA

Reprint requests to Dr. Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0628

This study describes sex differences in obesity and body fat distribution using commonly used assessment methods in 140 men and 245 women aged 65–96 years from Rancho Bernardo, California. Significant correlations were shown among all obesity measures. The waist/hip ratio was more strongly correlated with the truncal fat/leg fat ratio in women than men. The waist/hip ratio correlated significantly with the subscapular/triceps skinfold ratio in women only. In both sexes, waist circumference was more strongly correlated with body mass index and the percentage of body fat by bioelectric impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry than with the waist/hip ratio. In those aged over 80 years, age stratification showed that the waist/hip ratio was not correlated with any other measurement of obesity or fat distribution in men and correlated only with subscapular skinfolds in women. Waist circumference, however, correlated significantly with almost all other measures of central obesity in older and younger men and women. Estimates of upper body (central) fat distribution appear to be age specific. After age 80, the waist/hip ratio is a poor method of assessing central or visceral adiposity, and waist circumference is a better measure of body fat distribution. Am J Epidemiol 1996;143:898–906.

absorptiometry; photon; body constitution; electric impedance; obesity; radiography; dual-energy scanned projection


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Epidemiol RevHome page
G. Vazquez, S. Duval, D. R. Jacobs Jr., and K. Silventoinen
Comparison of Body Mass Index, Waist Circumference, and Waist/Hip Ratio in Predicting Incident Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis
Epidemiol. Rev., May 10, 2007; (2007) mxm008v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Langenberg, J. Bergstrom, G. A. Laughlin, and E. Barrett-Connor
Ghrelin and the Metabolic Syndrome in Older Adults
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2005; 90(12): 6448 - 6453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
N. M. Wedick, E. J. Mayer-Davis, D. L. Wingard, C. L. Addy, and E. Barrett-Connor
Insulin Resistance Precedes Weight Loss in Adults without Diabetes : The Rancho Bernardo Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., June 15, 2001; 153(12): 1199 - 1205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. R. Daniels, P. R. Khoury, and J. A. Morrison
Utility of Different Measures of Body Fat Distribution in Children and Adolescents
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2000; 152(12): 1179 - 1184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.