American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 141, No. 2: 166-172
Copyright © 1995 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health
research-article |
Estimation of Current Human Immunodeficiency Virus Incidence Rates from a Cross-Sectional Survey Using Early Diagnostic Tests
1Department of Biostatistics, School of Hygiene and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205
2Division of Infectious Diseases, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD and the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Bethesda, MD
Department of Biostatistics, School of Hygiene and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205. (Reprint requests to Dr. Brookmeyer at this address.)
In sharp contrast to the considerable worldwide epidemiologic data available on acquired immunodeficiency syndrome incidence and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seroprevalence, there is relatively little information about current levels of HIV incidence rates. The authors suggest a novel approach for estimating current HIV incidence rates based on a single cross-sectional survey and on an epidemiologic model. The approach is based on diagnostic tests for HIV p24 antigen to identify individuals in the preantibody or window period (time between exposure to HIV and appearance of detectable HIV antibodies). Individuals in the preantibody period are likely to have been infected very recently because the duration of the preantibody period is relatively short. The authors report data on the duration of p24 antigenemia prior to HIV serocon version. This duration together with the prevalence of p24 antigenemia obtained from a cross-sectional survey are used in an epidemiologic model to estimate current incidence rates. This approach of estimating incidence rates may be especially useful in developing countries and high-risk populations in which it is difficult to follow cohorts to identify seroconverters, and in the design of vaccine efficacy studies in which current incidence rates are crucial for calculating sample sizes.
acquired immunodeficlency syndrome; cross-sectional studies; epidemiologic methods; HIV seroprevalence statistics
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. I. Hall, R. Song, P. Rhodes, J. Prejean, Q. An, L. M. Lee, J. Karon, R. Brookmeyer, E. H. Kaplan, M. T. McKenna, et al. Estimation of HIV Incidence in the United States JAMA, August 6, 2008; 300(5): 520 - 529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Xiao, Y. Jiang, J. Feng, W. Xu, M. Wang, E. Funkhouser, S. H. Vermund, and Y. Jia Seroincidence of Recent Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infections in China Clin. Vaccine Immunol., October 1, 2007; 14(10): 1384 - 1386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Cole, H. Chu, and R. Brookmeyer Confidence Intervals for Biomarker-based Human Immunodeficiency Virus Incidence Estimates and Differences using Prevalent Data Am. J. Epidemiol., January 1, 2007; 165(1): 94 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Williamson, G. A. Satten, J. A. Hanson, H. Weinstock, and S. Datta Analysis of Dynamic Cohort Data Am. J. Epidemiol., August 15, 2001; 154(4): 366 - 372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. W. de Haard, B. Kazemier, M. J. M. Koolen, L. J. Nijholt, R. H. Meloen, B. van Gemen, H. R. Hoogenboom, and J.-W. Arends Selection of Recombinant, Library-Derived Antibody Fragments against p24 for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Diagnostics Clin. Vaccine Immunol., September 1, 1998; 5(5): 636 - 644. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Janssen, G. A. Satten, S. L. Stramer, B. D. Rawal, T. R. O'Brien, B. J. Weiblen, F. M. Hecht, N. Jack, F. R. Cleghorn, J. O. Kahn, et al. New Testing Strategy to Detect Early HIV-1 Infection for Use in Incidence Estimates and for Clinical and Prevention Purposes JAMA, July 1, 1998; 280(1): 42 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


