Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (62)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. A.H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by White, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. A.H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 139, No. 9: 857-868
Copyright © 1994 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

Case-Control Study of Malignant Melanoma in Washington State

I. Constitutional Factors and Sun Exposure

Emily White1, Constance S. Kirkpatrick1 2 and John A.H. Lee1

1Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, and Division of Public Health, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle, WA

Constitutional factors and sun exposure were examined among 256 cases of melanoma and 273 controls in three counties of western Washington State. Cases were individuals diagnosed with melanoma at ages 25–65 years during 1984–1987 who were identified from a Seattle-Puget Sound cancer registry. Population controls were identified through random digit dialing and were randomly selected, stratified by age, sex, and county. Participants completed a telephone interview with questions on demographic, sun exposure, and constitutional factors. Risk factors for melanoma were examined through the use of logistic regression, controlling for age, sex, and educational level, and data on each exposure variable were tested for the significance of trends across levels of exposure. The constitutional factor most strongly associated with mela noma risk was sun sensitivity, measured as either reaction to chronic sun exposure (for no tan vs. deep tan, odds ratio (OR) = 9.0, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 3.8–21.1; p<0.001 for trend across four categories) or reaction to acute sun exposure (for severe burn vs. tan, OR = 5.7, 95% Cl 2.6–12.6; p<0.001 for trend across four categories). The number of raised nevi counted on both arms by subjects was also associated with increasing risk (for ≥10 nevi vs. none, OR = 5.7,95% Cl 2.2–14.6; p for trend <0.001). Sun exposure in adulthood and occupational sun exposure were not related to mela noma risk. The effect of sun exposure in childhood on melanoma risk was modified by tanning ability. Poor tanners showed no effect of sun exposure at ages 12–10 years or ages 11–20 years. In contrast, people who reported a deep or moderate tan in reaction to chronic sun exposure appeared to be protected from melanoma with increasing sun exposure at ages 2–10 years (for upper third vs. lower third, OR = 0.3, 95% Cl 0.2–0.6; p for trend < 0.001), with identical results for exposure at ages 11–20 years. The finding that childhood sun exposure is protective only among those able to tan supports the hypothesis that developing a tan during childhood may reduce the risk of melanoma by offering protection from the effects of sunlight exposure.

melanoma; nevus; skin pigmentation; sunlight


2Current address: Good Samaritan Hospital Puyallup, WA.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
S A Oliveria, M Saraiya, A C Geller, M K Heneghan, and C Jorgensen
Sun exposure and risk of melanoma
Arch. Dis. Child., February 1, 2006; 91(2): 131 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch DermatolHome page
R. Holland and I. Harvey
Adult vs Childhood Susceptibility to Melanoma: Is There a Difference?
Arch Dermatol, September 1, 2002; 138(9): 1234 - 1235.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
A. V. Brenner, J. H. Lubin, D. Calista, and M. T. Landi
Instrumental Measurements of Skin Color and Skin Ultraviolet Light Sensitivity and Risk of Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma: A Case-Control Study in an Italian Population
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 15, 2002; 156(4): 353 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. P. Gallagher, J. K. Rivers, T. K. Lee, C. D. Bajdik, D. I. McLean, and A. J. Coldman
Broad-Spectrum Sunscreen Use and the Development of New Nevi in White Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA, June 14, 2000; 283(22): 2955 - 2960.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. S. Stern, K. T. Nichols, L. H. Vakeva, and The PUVA Follow-up Study
Malignant Melanoma in Patients Treated for Psoriasis with Methoxsalen (Psoralen) and Ultraviolet A Radiation (PUVA)
N. Engl. J. Med., April 10, 1997; 336(15): 1041 - 1045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Fam MedHome page
L. H. Kaminester
Current Concepts: Photoprotection
Arch Fam Med, May 1, 1996; 5(5): 289 - 295.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch DermatolHome page
H. K. Koh, A. C. Geller, D. R. Miller, T. A. Grossbart, and R. A. Lew
Prevention and Early Detection Strategies for Melanoma and Skin Cancer: Current Status
Arch Dermatol, April 1, 1996; 132(4): 436 - 443.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch DermatolHome page
A. Katsambas and E. Nicolaidou
Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma and Sun Exposure: Recent Developments in Epidemiology
Arch Dermatol, April 1, 1996; 132(4): 444 - 450.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal Watch DermatologyHome page
Sun Sensitivity Strongly Associated with Development of Melanoma
Journal Watch Dermatology, September 1, 1994; 1994(901): 3 - 3.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.